[284] Bury, Tírechán’s Memoir, 248-250.
[285] Bury, Tírechán’s Memoir, 239.
[286] 319₄. Bury, “Supplementary Notes” (Eng. Hist. Rev. Oct. 1902), 702-703.
[287] It stops at p. 331, l. 9, in the Rolls ed. See my paper in E.H.R. ut cit. p. 237.
[288] Proc. of R.I.A. (xxiv. sect. C, 3), 1903, p. 164 sqq.
[289] This has been fully recognised by Dr. Gwynn, loc. cit.
[290] Machia (330₂₂) probably means Domnach Maigen, not Armagh (Gwynn, loc. cit.).
[291] 348₁₈, d.g. [= Duma Graid, Reeves, but this is far from certain]; Ailbe i Senchui altáre; and Machet Cetchen Rodán Mathona. Compare also 350₈ with 331₄.
[292] The credibility of the Genealogy, as an independent record, is particularly strong; the Ballymote scribe was acquainted with the Tripartite, and quotes from it à propos of the sons of Forat, notwithstanding the contradiction. The discrepancy with the Patrician tradition is, in fact, a guarantee that the record is trustworthy.
[293] P. 269₁₃ Rolls ed.: patris mei Coguitosi, the brilliant correction of Bishop Graves for the corrupt cognito si in A. On the passage, and on Cogitosus, see his paper in the Proceedings R.I.A. viii. 269 sqq.