[176:1] I. p. 466.
[176:2] Our author has not mentioned the various reading [Greek: logôn] for [Greek: logiôn] here, though Hilgenfeld speaks of it as the reading of the 'best editions.' If it were correct, it would upset his argument; but the most recent critical editor, Laemmer, has adopted [Greek: logiôn].
[177:1] Iren. Hær. v. 20. 2; Dion. Cor. in Euseb. H.E. iv. 23.
[177:2] Ep. Barn. 4, 5. The bearing of this fact on the testimony of Papias is pointed out in an able and scholarly article on Supernatural Religion in the April [1875] number of the Dublin Review, p. 403.
[177:3] [The Essay on the Epistle of Barnabas was never written; see the Preface to this Reprint.]
[178:1] See above, p. 34 sq.
[178:2] [See above, pp. 36 sq, 46 sq.]
[179:1] [Preface to S.R. ed. 6, pp. xi—xxiii.]
[179:2] [The passage quoted occurs above, p. 38 'Eusebius therefore proposes—however precise.']
[179:3] Preface to S.R. ed. 6, p. xv.