On p. 321. there are two separate references to footnote 537. This seems to be intentional, and have been retained. Likewise, on p. [343], footnote [609] is repeated. It seems most likely that the second instance is correct, but both have been retained.
On p. 416, in the Index, the entry for ἅλας refers to iv. 5. However, the word and its gloss appear in [iv. 6].
| p. [28] | He recal[l]s | Added. | |
| p. 43 | n. [143] | coin[ci]dence | Added. |
| p. 121 | n. [339] | Zeitsc[h]rift | Added. |
| p. [199] | a similar pheno[nem/men]on | Transposed. | |
| p. [213] | c. Eunom. iv ([p. ]I.p. 292) | Removed. | |
| p. [230] | The thought underlying νῦν seems [to] be this | Added. | |
| p. [231] | explaining it [as ]‘the later’ | Added. | |
| p. [323] | theological con[fu]sion | Added. | |
| p. 373 | n. [680] | from the allied f[ro/or]m Apphias. | Transposed. |