[209] See a good study of Empedokles in J. A. Symonds’ Studies of the Greek Poets, 3rd ed. 1893, vol. i, ch. 7; and another in Renouvier, Manuel, i, 163–82. [↑]
[210] Cp. Grote, Plato, i, 73, and note. [↑]
[211] Cp. Renouvier, i, 239–62; Lange, p. 11 (tr. p. 17). [↑]
[213] Diogenes Laërtius, bk. ix, ch. viii, § 3 (51); cp. Grote, vii, 49, note. [↑]
[214] For a defence of Protagoras against Plato, see Grote, vii, 43–54. [↑]
[215] Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos, ix, 56. [↑]
[216] Beckmann, History of Inventions, Eng. tr. 1846, ii, 513. [↑]
[217] Diod. Sic. xiii, 6; Hesychius, cit. in Cudworth, ed. Harrison, i, 131. [↑]
[218] Ueberweg, i, 80; Thukydides, v, 116. The bias of Sextus Empiricus is further shown in his account of Diagoras as moved in his denunciation by an injury to himself. [↑]