[26] E.g., Mr. A. J. Balfour’s Foundations of Belief. [↑]

[27] Tusc. Disp. i, 26. [↑]

[28] De Divinatione, ii, 33, 34, cp. ii, 12; and De nat. Deorum, i, 22. It is not surprising that in a later age, when the remaining pagans had no dialectic faculty left, the Christian Fathers, by using Cicero as a weapon against the cults, could provoke them into calling him impious (Arnobius, Adv. Gentes, iii, 6, 7). [↑]

[29] De Divinatione, ii, 22. [↑]

[30] Boissier, i, 58. [↑]

[31] De nat. Deorum, ii, 1. [↑]

[32] Boissier, p. 59. [↑]

[33] “It seems to me that, on the whole, among the educated and the rich, the indifferent must have been in the majority” (Boissier, p. 61). [↑]

[34] Id. p. 59. [↑]

[35] Cp. Long, Decline of Roman Republic, i, 438; ii, 38–40. Long remarks that Domitius, the accuser of Scaurus (who had prevented his election to the college of augurs), “used the name of religion for the purpose of damaging a political enemy; and the trick has been repeated, and is repeated, up to the present day. The Romans must have kept records of many of these trials. They were the great events of the times ...; and so we learn that three tribes voted against Scaurus, and thirty-two voted for him; but in each of these thirty-two tribes there was only a small majority of votes (pauca puncta) in favour of Scaurus.” [↑]