[99] B. ii, c. 78. [↑]

[100] B. ii, c. 49. [↑]

[101] B. ii, c. 30. [↑]

[102] B. iii, c. 1. [↑]

[103] B. iv, cc. 23–30, 54–60, 74. [↑]

[104] Cp. A. Kind, Teleologie und Naturalismus in der altchristlichen Zeit, 1875; Soury, Bréviaire de l’histoire du Matérialisme, pp. 331–40. [↑]

[105] B. i, chs. 9–11; iii, 44. [↑]

[106] Cp. Renan, Marc-Aurèle, pp. 373–77. [↑]

[107] Christian excisions have been suspected in the Peregrinus, § 11 (Bernays, Lucian und die Kyniker, 1879, p. 107). But see Mr. J. M. Cotterill’s Peregrinus Proteus, Edinburgh, 1879, for a theory of the spuriousness of the treatise, which is surmised to be a fabrication of Henri Etienne. [↑]

[108] Logoi Philaletheis, known only from the reply of Eusebius, Contra Hiroclem. Hierocles made much of Apollonius of Tyana, as having greatly outdone Jesus in miracles, while ranking simply as a God-beloved man. [↑]