[18] Gibbon, as cited, vi, 241. [↑]
[19] Gibbon, vi, 242; Hardwick, pp. 88–90. [↑]
[20] Gibbon, vi, 245, and note; Finlay, ii, 60. [↑]
[21] Despite the express decision, the use of statues proper (ἀγάλματα) gradually disappeared from the Greek Church, the disuse finally creating a strong antipathy, while pictures and ikons remained in reverence (Tozer’s note to Finlay, ii, 165; cp. Waddington, History of the Church, 1833, p. 190, note). It is probable that the sheer loss of artistic skill counted for much in the change. Cp. Milman, Latin Christianity, bk. xiv, ch. ix; 4th ed. ix, 308–12. It is noteworthy that, whereas in the struggle over images their use was for two long periods legally abolished, it was in both cases restored by empresses Irene and Theodora. [↑]
[22] Hardwick, p. 80, note; Neander, vi, 340. [↑]
[23] Cp. Kurtz, His. of the Chr. Church, Eng. tr. i, 271. [↑]
[24] Gibbon, vi, 246; Finlay, iii, 64; Mosheim, 10 Cent. pt. ii, ch. v. [↑]
[26] Gibbon, as cited; R. Lane Poole, Illustrations of the History of Medieval Thought, 1884, pp. 91–96; Mosheim, 11 Cent. pt. ii, ch. v. [↑]
[27] Finlay, iii, 67–68; Mosheim, 12 Cent. pt. ii, ch. v, § 2. Hardwick, pp. 302–305; Kurtz, i, 270–73. [↑]