[3] Cp. the English History of Servetus, 1724, p. 39, and Trechsel, Lelio Sozzini und die Antitrinitarier seiner Zeit (Bd. ii. of Die protestantischen Antitrinitarier), 1844, pp. 38–41. [↑]
[4] Cited by Trechsel, p. 42, note. [↑]
[5] Cp. Bayle, art. Ochin; Miss Lowndes, Michel de Montaigne, p. 266; Owen, French Skeptics, p. 588; Benrath, Bernardino Ochino of Siena, Eng. tr. 1876, pp. 268–72. McCrie mentions (Ref. in Italy, p. 228, note) that Ochino’s dialogue on polygamy has been translated and published in England “by the friends of that practice.” (In 1657. Rep. 1732.) [↑]
[6] Above, pp. 458–59, Sermons (orthodox) by Ochino were published in English in 1548, and often reprinted. [↑]
[7] D’Ewes, Journals of Parliament in the Reign of Elizabeth, 1682, p. 65. [↑]
[9] The Scholemaster, Arber’s rep. p. 82. [↑]
[10] E.g., work cited, pt. ii, Max. 1, and Max. 6, end. Eng. tr. 1608, pp. 93, 128. [↑]
[11] Mark Pattison, Essay on Joseph Scaliger, in Essays, Routledge’s ed. i, 114. [↑]
[12] When Pattison declares that Italian curiosity had bred “not secret unbelief but callous acquiescence” he sets up a spurious antithesis; and when he generalizes that in Italy “men did not disbelieve the truths of the Christian religion,” he understates the case. He errs equally in the opposite direction when he alleges (ib. p. 141) that in the France of Montaigne “a philosophical skepticism had become the creed of all thinking men.” Such a difference between France and Italy was impossible. [↑]