[79] Fairbanks, p. 4. [↑]

[80] Diogenes Laërtius, Thales, ch. 9. [↑]

[81] Fairbanks, pp. 3, 7. [↑]

[82] Herodotos, i, 74. [↑]

[83] Cp. Burnet, Early Greek Philos. 2nd. ed. introd. § 3. To Thales is ascribed by the Greeks the “discovery” of the constellation Ursus Major. Diog. ch. 2. As it was called “Phoenike” by the Greeks, his knowledge would be of Phoenician derivation. Cp. Humboldt, Kosmos, Bohn tr. iii, 160. [↑]

[84] Diog. Laërt. ch. 3. On this cp. Burnet, introd. § 6. [↑]

[85] Herod. i, 170. Cp. Diog. Laërt. ch. 3. [↑]

[86] Diog. Laërt. ch. 9. [↑]

[87] Cp. Burnet, p. 57. [↑]

[88] Fairbanks, pp. 9–10. Mr. Benn (Greek Philosophers, i, 9) decides that the early philosophers, while realizing that ex nihilo nihil fit, had not grasped the complementary truth that nothing can be annihilated. But even if the teaching ascribed to Anaximandros be set aside as contradictory (since he spoke of generation and destruction within the infinite), we have the statement of Diogenes Laërtius (bk. ix, ch. 9, § 57) that Diogenes of Apollonia, pupil of Anaximenes, gave the full Lucretian formula. [↑]