[70] Hunter, pp. 37, 39. [↑]

[71] Skeats, as cited, p. 226. [↑]

[72] Hunter, pp. 24–25. [↑]

[73] Skeats (pp.239–40) sums up that while the Baptists had probably “never been entirely free from the taint” of Unitarianism, the Particular Baptists and the Congregationalists were saved from it by their lack of men of “eminently speculative mind”; while the Presbyterians “were men, for the most part, of larger reading than other Nonconformists, and the writings of Whiston and Clarke had found their way among them.” But the tendency existed before Whiston and Clarke. [↑]

[74] History, cited, p. 22; Hunter, pp. 44–45; Skeats, pp. 243–44. [↑]

[75] Skeats, pp. 240–43, 245 sq. [↑]

[76] Skeats, p. 248. [↑]

[77] Hunter, p. 50. [↑]

[78] As Sir Leslie Stephen has observed (English Thought, i, 164), Chubb “deserves the praise of Malthusians.” Having a sufficiency of means for himself, but not more, he “lived a single life, judging it greatly improper to introduce a family into the world without a prospect of maintaining them.” The proverb as to mouths and meat, he drily observes, had not been verified in his experience. (The Author’s Account of Himself, pref. to Posthumous Works, 1748, i, p. iv.) [↑]

[79] One of the then numerous tribe of eccentrics. He held by Judaic Sabbatarianism, and affected a Rabinnical costume. He made a competence, however, as an ironmonger. [↑]