[256] Zur Gesch. der Rel. u. Philos. in Deutschland. Werke, as cited, iii, 96, 98. [↑]

[257] Stuckenberg, p. 311. [↑]

[258] Id. p. 357. [↑]

[259] Stuckenberg, p. 351. “It is only necessary,” adds Stuckenberg (p. 468, note 142), “to develop Kant’s hints in order to get the views of Strauss in his Leben Jesu.” [↑]

[260] Id. p. 375. Erhard stated that Pestalozzi shared his views on Christian ethics. [↑]

[261] Stuckenberg, p. 358. [↑]

[262] Cp. Weber, Gesch. der deutschen Literatur, 11te Aufl. p. 119; R. Unger, Hamann und die Aufklärung, 1911. [↑]

[263] Bartholmèss, Hist. crit. des doctr. relig. de la philos. moderne, 1855, i, 136–40. [↑]

[264] In demanding a “history of the human conscience” (Neue Anthropologie, 1790) Platner seems to have anticipated the modern scientific approach to religion. [↑]

[265] Gespräche über den Atheismus, 1781. [↑]