[53] Work cited, pp. 8–11, 22. [↑]
[54] Works, i, 432; ii, 762–63. [↑]
[55] Eccles. Pol. bk. i, ch. vii; bk. ii, ch. i, vii; bk. iii, ch. viii, § 16; bk. v, ch. viii; bk. vii, ch. xi; bk. viii, § 6 (Works, i, 165, 231, 300, 446; ii, 388, 537). See the citations in Buckle, 3-vol. ed. iii, 341–42; 1-vol. ed. pp. 193–94. [↑]
[56] Supplication of Travers, in Hooker’s Works, ed. 1850, ii, 662. [↑]
[57] Answer to Travers, id. p. 693. [↑]
[58] Some typical attempts of the kind are discussed in the author’s two lectures on The Religion of Shakespeare, 1887 (South Place Institute). [↑]
[59] Shakespeare Commentaries, Eng. tr. 1863, ii, 618–19. [↑]
[61] In the last edition I had written to that effect; but I have modified the opinion. [↑]
[62] The allusion to “popish ceremonies” in Titus Andronicus is probably from his hand. See the author’s work, Did Shakespeare Write “Titus Andronicus”?, where it is argued that the play in question is substantially Peele’s and Greene’s. [↑]