[283] Baur, last cit. p. 389. [↑]
[284] Geständnisse, Werke, iv, 33. Cp. iii, 110. [↑]
[285] Cp. Hagenbach, pp. 369–72; Farrar, Crit. Hist. of Freethought, pp. 387–88. On Bauer’s critical development and academic career see Baur, Kirchengesch. des 19ten Jahrh. pp. 386–89. [↑]
[286] Die Selbstzersetzung des Christenthums und die Religion der Zukunft, 2te Aufl. 1874 trans. in Eng. as The Religion of the Future, 1886. [↑]
[287] See Schopenhauer’s dialogues on Religion and Immortality, and his essay on The Christian System (Eng. tr. by T. B. Samplers), and Nietzsche’s Antichrist. The latter work is discussed by the writer in Essays in Sociology, vol. ii. [↑]
[288] Prof. Seth Pringle-Pattison, who passes many just criticisms on their work (Philos. of Relig. in Kant and Hegel, rep. with The Philosophical Radicals), does not seem to suspect this determination. [↑]
[289] Baur gives a good summary, Kirchengeschichte, pp. 390–94. [↑]
[290] “M. Feuerbach et la nouvelle école hégélienne,” in Études d’histoire religieuse. [↑]
[291] A. Kohut, Ludwig Feuerbach, sein Leben und seine Werke, 1909, p. 48. [↑]
[292] Die Halben und die Ganzen, p. 50. “Feuerbach a ruiné le système de Hegel et fondé la positivisme.” A. Lévy, La philosophie de Feuerbach et son influence sur la litt. allemande, 1904, introd. p. xxii. [↑]