[128] See notes in ed. cited, pp. 50, 53, 61, 63, 68, 75, 76, 84, 110. [↑]
[129] Fowler, ed. of Nov. Org. § 14, pp. 101–104. [↑]
[130] Id. § 14, p. 108; Ellis in ed. cited, p. 643. [↑]
[131] Rawley’s Life, in ed. cited, p. 9; Osborn, as above cited; Fowler, ed. of Nov. Org. Introd. § 14; T. Martin, Character of Bacon, 1835, pp. 216, 227, 222–23. [↑]
[132] Cp. Fowler, Bacon, pp. 139–41; Mill, Logic, bk. vi, ch. v, § 5; Jevons, Princ. of Science, 1-vol. ed. p. 576; Tyndall, Scientific Use of the Imagination, 3rd ed. pp. 4, 8–9, 42–43; T. Martin, as cited, pp. 210–38; Bagehot, Postulates of Eng. Polit. Econ. ed. 1885, pp. 18–19; Ellis and Spedding, in ed. cited, pp. x, xii, 22, 389. The notion of a dialectic method which should mechanically enable any man to make discoveries is an irredeemable fallacy, and must be abandoned. Bacon’s own remarkable anticipation of modern scientific thought in the formula that heat is a mode of motion (Nov. Org. ii, 20) is not mechanically yielded by his own process, noteworthy and suggestive though that is. [↑]
[134] Works, ed. Dublin. 1766, p. 159; ed. 1910, p. 344. [↑]
[135] Kohlrausch, Hist. of Germany, Eng. tr. p. 385. [↑]
[136] Moritz Ritter, Geschichte der deutschen Union, 1867–73, ii, 55. [↑]
[137] Menzel, Geschichte der Deutschen, 3te Aufl. Cap. 416. [↑]