[1190] Bishop Trench (Narrative of the Earl of Clarendon's Settlement and Sale of Ireland, Dublin rep. 1843, pp. 84-93) declares that not only were all re-appropriations to be compensated, but the 54 nominees added to the original list of 500 loyalist officers to be rewarded had not received an acre of land as late as 1675. Hallam sums up on Anglican lines that the Catholics could not "reasonably murmur against the confiscation of half their estates, after a civil war wherein it was evident that so large a proportion of themselves were concerned." In reality, much more than half the land had been confiscated; and all the while the bulk of it remained in the hands of men who had themselves been in rebellion! The settlement was simply a racial iniquity.
[1191] Macaulay, ch. vi, Student's ed. i, 393.
[1192] Id. ib.
[1193] For a full account of the procedure see Thomas Davis's work, The Patriot Parliament of 1689, rep. with introd. by Sir C. Gavan Duffy, 1893.
[1194] Cp. the author's Saxon and Celt, pp. 160, 161, and note.
[1195] H.D. Traill, Strafford, 1889, p. 81.
[1196] Lecky, History of Ireland in the Eighteenth Century, i, 174.
[1197] See Petty, Essays in Political Arithmetic, ed. 1699, p. 186.
[1198] The checking of the Irish wool trade was strongly urged by Temple in the English interest (Essay on the Advancement of Trade in Ireland, Works, iii, 10).
[1199] See Dr. Hill Burton's History of the Reign of Queen Anne, 1880, iii, 160-63. This measure seems to have been overlooked by Mr. Lecky in his narrative, History of Ireland, i, 178.