[34] Friedländer’s thesis that the Minim were early Gnostics seems to be completely upset by Mr. Herford, Christianity in Talmud, p. 368 sq. [↑]

[35] Id. pp. 255–266. [↑]

[36] The fact that the Talmudic allusions to the Minim include no discussion of the Christist doctrine of the Messiah (Herford, pp. 277, 279) goes to show that a Messianic doctrine had been no part of the early cult, and that among the Jesuists who kept up their connection with Judaism it gathered, or kept, no hold. [↑]

[37] Cp. Volkmar, Die Religion Jesu, 1857, p. 287. [↑]

[38] Justin, 1 Apol. 26. [↑]

[39] Id. ib. [↑]

[40] See the whole subject discussed in Appendix B. [↑]

[41] C. 120, end. [↑]

[42] See H. J. 182. [↑]

[43] Ecce Deus, p. 68. In his article in the Literary Guide, June, 1913, Professor Smith argues that only as a protest against idolatry and a crusade for monotheism could Proto-Christianity have succeeded with the Gentiles. But that was simply the line of Judaism, which had no Son-God to cloud its monotheism. Surely Jesuism appealed to the Gentiles primarily as did other Saviour-cults, ultimately distancing these by reason of organization. [↑]