(Exteriorisations): Motor.—Telekinesis; psychography (direct writing); psychophony (direct voice).
——— Sensitive-Sensorial.—Telepathy; telæsthesia.
——— Plastic.—Materialisations; apports, etc.
On the other hand, if we examine fraud in a general manner, we will notice the following correspondences: the words conscious and unconscious are taken in the sense of the personal consciousness:—
| Motricity: | normal. | 1. | Conscious and voluntary movements. | Conscious voluntary fraud. Simulation; responsibility. |
| —— | —— | 2. | Conscious but involuntary movements. | Conscious impulsive fraud. Simulation; irresponsibility. |
| —— | —— | 3. | Unconscious and involuntary movements. | Impulsive and unconscious fraud; irresponsibility. |
| —— | paranormal. | 4. | Exteriorisation of motricity and plasticity; telekinesis; materialisations. | No fraud. |
| Sensibility: | normal. | 5. | Voluntary falsehood. | Voluntary and conscious fraud. Simulation; responsibility. |
| Sensibility: | normal. | 6. | Illusions; hallucinations; hypermnesiæ; paramnesiæ. | No fraud; no real phenomenon. |
| —— | paranormal. | 7. | Exteriorisation of the sensibility; clairaudience; telepathy; clairvoyance. | No fraud; real phenomena. |
As for true exosomatic automatism, there can be no question of fraud as far as it is concerned. This classification, which I only give as an experiment, appears to me more complete than that of Ochorowicz’s (Annales de Sciences Psychiques, vi. 97). The latter distinguishes—
| (a) | Conscious fraud. | ||
| (b) | Unconscious fraud: | ||
| in the waking state | } | Medianity of an inferior order. | |
| in the trance state | |||
| (c) | Partial, automatic fraud | } | Medianity of a superior order. |
| (d) | The pure phenomenon | ||
If we compare Ochorowicz’s table with mine we will notice that his conscious fraud corresponds to Nos. 1 and 5 of my classification.
His unconscious fraud to No. 3.