TemperatureDuration of life of the eggs of S. purpuratus
UnfertilizedFertilized
°C.MinutesMinutes
32 > 116 112
< 2
31 > 214
< 3
30 > 3 > 4
< 5 < 5
29 > 6
< 7
28 > 8 > 11
< 10 < 13
27about 18 > 20
< 22
26 > 35 > 35
< 40 < 40
25 > 76
< 81
24> 168 > 192
< 200 < 209
Hours
22 1015
21 24
20 72

These observa­tions show a very high temperature coefficient near the upper temperature limit, and this may account at least partly for the fact that in tropical seas the pelagic fauna is so much more limited than in polar seas.[308] It is quite probable that the high temperature coefficients at the utmost limits are only an expression of the coagula­tion time of certain proteins.

P. and N. Rau state that in the cold certain butterflies live longer, and similar statements exist for the silkworm, but these statements are not based on exact experi­ments, which are difficult. Dr. Northrop and the writer have started experi­ments on the influence of temperature on the dura­tion of life of the fly Drosophila. Newly hatched flies were kept first without food except water and air at 34°, 28°, 24°, 19°, 14°, and 10°, and second with cane sugar. The average dura­tion of life was as follows:

With waterdaysWith cane sugardays
34°.......2.1..........6.2
28°.......2.4..........7.2
24°.......2.4..........9.4
19°.......4.1..........12.3
14°.......8.3
10°.......11.9

These experi­ments show that there is a definite temperature coefficient for the dura­tion of life and that this coefficient is of the order of magnitude of that of a chemical reac­tion. We are continuing these experi­ments with animals in the presence of food. It should, however, be remembered that the fly carries with it a good deal of reserve material from the larval period. We have carried on simultaneously determina­tions of the temperature coefficients of the dura­tion of the larval and pupa stage of these organisms at the same temperatures and found ratios similar to those given above for the dura­tion of life with water only.

7. Metchnikoff[309] has furnished the scientific facts for our understanding of senescence. He has demonstrated that the changes in tissue which give rise to phenomena of senility are due to the action of phagocytes. Thus the ganglion cells are altered (digested?) and destroyed by “neuronophags” and this is the main cause of mental senility. Definite phagocytic cells, the osteoclasts, slowly dissolve the bones (by the excre­tion of an acid?) and this leads to the known fragility of the bones in old age. The whiteness of the hair is due to the action of phagocytes; in the muscles in old age the contractile elements are destroyed by the sarcoplasm, and so on. It agrees with these facts that where organs are absorbed in the embryonic development of an animal, as e. g., the tail of the tadpole in metamorphosis, the phenomenon is due to a process of phagocytosis (and autolysis). We have men­tioned the fact that in the larva of the Amblystoma the absorp­tion of the gills and of the tail occurs simultaneously and that both must be caused by a constituent of the blood. Such a constituent may be responsible for phagocytosis and autolysis in the organs undergoing absorp­tion. Metchnikoff calls atten­tion to the fact that certain infectious diseases, e. g., syphilis, may bring about precocious senility; and he men­tions also the senile appearance of young cretins which is due to the diseased thyroid. “It is no mere analogy to suppose that human senescence is the result of a slow but chronic poisoning of the organism.” He assumes that in man this poisoning is caused by the products of fermenta­tion in the large intestine and that the micro-organisms responsible for these fermenta­tions may therefore be regarded as the real cause of senility in man. Parrots which are long-lived birds have a limited flora of microbes in their intestine, while cows and horses which are short-lived in comparison with man possess an extraordinary richness of the intestinal flora. But, needless to say, it is not the quantity of microbes alone which is to be considered, the nature of the microbes is of much greater importance.

Certain plants like the Californian Sequoia gigantea may be considered as practically immortal since they live several thousands of years; other plants, the annuals, die after fructifica­tion. Metchnikoff quotes from a letter by de Vries that this author prolonged the life of Œnotheras by cutting the flowers before fertiliza­tion.

Under ordinary condi­tions the stem dies after producing from forty to fifty flowers, but if cutting be practised new flowers are produced until the winter cold intervenes. By cutting the stem sufficiently early the plants are induced to develop new buds at the base and these buds survive winter and resume growth in the following spring.

Metchnikoff suggests that it is a poison formed in the plant (in connec­tion with fructifica­tion?) which kills the annuals, while it is not formed or is less harmful in the perennials. He compares the situa­tion to the death of the lactic acid bacilli if the lactic acid is allowed to accumulate. This hypothesis is certainly worthy of considera­tion, and it is quite possible that in addi­tion to structural shortcomings poisons formed by certain organs of the body as well as poisons formed by bacteria account for the phenomenon of death in metazoa.