By
Sir J. C. Bose,
Assisted by
Guruprasanna Das.
In plant physiology, the word ‘stimulus’ is often used in a very indefinite manner. This is probably due to the different meanings which have been attached to the word. An agent is said to stimulate growth, when it induces an acceleration. But the normal effect of stimulus is to cause a retardation of growth. It is probably on account of lack of precision in the use of the term that we often find it stated, that a stimulus sometimes accelerates, and at other times, retards growth. In order to avoid any ambiguity, it is very desirable that the term stimulus should always be used in the sense as definite as in animal physiology. An induction shock, a condenser discharge, the make or break of a constant current, a sudden variation of temperature, and a mechanical shock bring about an excitatory contraction in a muscle. These various forms of stimuli cause, as we have seen, a similar excitatory contraction of the motile pulvinus of Mimosa pudica. We shall enquire whether the diverse forms of stimuli enumerated above, exert similar or different reactions on the growing organ.
EFFECT OF ELECTRIC STIMULUS OF VARYING INTENSITY AND DURATION.
The form of stimulus which is extensively used in physiological investigations, is the electric stimulus of induction shock which is easily graduated by the use of the well known sliding induction coil, in which the approach of the secondary to the primary coil, indicated by the higher reading of the scale, gives rise to increasing intensity of stimulus. The retarding effect of electrical stimulus on growth has already been demonstrated in record taken on a moving plate ([Fig. 61]).
I shall adopt for unit stimulus, that intensity of electric shock which induces a barely perceptible sensation in a human being. It is very interesting to find, as stated before, that growth is often affected by an electric stimulus, which is below the range of human perception.
