Tropic curvatures in general are brought about by the differential effect of stimulus on two sides of the organ. Thus light falling on one side of a shoot induces local contraction, the rays being cut off from acting on the further side by the opacity of the intervening tissue. But there is no opaque screen to cut off the vertical lines of gravity,[29] which enter the upper side of a horizontally laid shoot and leave it by the lower side. Though lines of force of gravity are transmitted without hindrance, yet a differential action is found to take place, for the upper side, where the lines of force enter, becomes concave, while the lower side where they emerge becomes convex. Why should there be this difference?
For the removal of various obscurities connected with geotropism it is therefore necessary to elucidate the following:
1. The sign of excitation is, as we found, a contraction and concomitant galvanometric negativity. Does gravitational stimulus, like stimulus in general, induce this excitatory reaction?
2. What is the effective direction of geotropic stimulus? In the case of light, we are able to trace the rays of light which is incident on the proximal side and measure the angle of inclination. In the case of gravity, the invisible lines of force enter by one side of the organ and leave by the other side. Assuming that the direction of stimulus is coincident with the vertical lines of gravity, is it the upper or the lower side of the organ that undergoes effective stimulation?
3. What is the law relating to the 'directive angle' and the resulting geotropic curvature? By the directive angle (sometimes referred to as the angle of inclination) is meant, as previously explained, the angle which direction of stimulus makes with the responding surface.
4. We have finally to investigate, whether the assumption of opposite irritabilities of the root and the shoot is at all justifiable. If not, we have to find the true explanation of the opposite curvatures exhibited by the two types of organs.
Of these the first three are inter-related. They will, however, be investigated separately; and each by more than one method of inquiry. The results will be found to be in complete harmony with each other.
I propose in this and in the following chapters to carry out the investigations sketched above, employing two independent methods of enquiry, namely, of mechanical and of electrical response. I shall first describe the automatic method I have been able to devise, for an accurate and magnified record of geotropic movement and its time relations.
THE GEOTROPIC RECORDER.
The recorder shown in figure 157 is very convenient for study of geotropic movement. The apparatus is four-sided and it is thus possible to obtain four simultaneous records with different specimens under identical conditions. The recording levers are free from contact with the recording surface. By an appropriate clock-work mechanism, the levers are pressed for a fraction of a second against the recording surfaces. The successive dots in the record may, according to different requirements, be at intervals varying from 5 to 20 seconds. The records therefore not only give the characteristic curves of geotropic movements of different plants, but also their time durations. For high magnification, I employ an Oscillating Recorder, the short arm of the lever being 2·5 mm., and the long arm 250 mm., the magnification being a hundredfold; half that magnification is, however, sufficient for general purposes.