[669]. Essay, 7th ed., IV. xiii. 473.
[670]. Pol. Econ. (1836), ch. iv. sect. iii. p. 239, slightly altered from 1st ed., 1820, ch. iv. sect. iii. p. 266.
[671]. Sismondi, Nouveaux Principes de l’Écon. Pol., 1819. See Malthus, Pol. Econ. (1820), p. 420, (1836) pp. 325 n., 366 n. Cf. on the other hand Essay, III. xiii. 372–3 and n.
[672]. Wealth of Nations, V. i. art. ii. pp. 350–353 (ed. MacC.). He is outrivalled by Ferguson, Civil Society, parts iv. and v. (ed. 1773).
[673]. 3rd ed. of Pol. Ec. and Tax. (1821), ch. xxxi. pp. 468–9, ed. MacCull., pp. 235–6. Cf. below (Critics). It is the position of Marx.
[674]. If we believe Bowring, Life of Bentham (ed. 1843), p. 176.
[675]. “Supposing that his opinions have not altered within the last twelve months.”—De Quincey, vol. iv. p. 231.
[676]. James Mill, Elements, pp. 193, 194. MacCull., Pol. Ec., p. 207. Cf. the tract Mordecai Mullion (1826).
[677]. Especially by Sunday Schools, according to the testimony of Samuel Bamford.—Radical, vol. i. p. 7 (1844).
[678]. We have his counterpart in our own day.