[350]. Levasseur, La France, l. c.
[351]. E. g. Times, l. c.
[352]. Essay, 7th ed., IV. xiii. p. 474; 2nd ed., IV. xi. p. 594.
[353]. 2nd ed., II. ix.; 7th ed., II. viii, ix.
[354]. 1st ed., pp. 63, 64.
[355]. 1st ed., pp. 65–6; cf. 2nd ed., p. 300, and 7th ed., p. 193.
[356]. See below, Bk. II. ch. iv., &c.
[357]. The numbers given then were five millions.—Froude, Hist. of England, i. 3.
[358]. See Hansard, Parl. Hist., xiv. 1317.
[359]. Not unfelt in 1801. So Arthur Young speaks as if the agricultural interest had not unfrequently regarded the Board of Agriculture as a new instrument of taxation. (Report on Suffolk, p. 16.)