[102] Thomas in ‘Prinsep,’ vol. i. p. 144.
[103] ‘Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal,’ vol. iii. p. 559.
[104] Thomas in ‘Prinsep,’ p. 148.
[105] ‘Archæological Reports,’ vol. ii. p. 167, plate 65.
[106] Thomas’s ‘Prinsep,’ vol. i. p. 94.
[107] In the text it is certainly printed “three” with a reference to 19 in the plate 21 of vol. iii. The latter is undoubtedly a misprint, and I cannot help believing the former is so also, as only one fragment is figured; and Prinsep complains more than once of the state of the French MS. from which he was compiling his account. I observe that General Cunningham, in his volume just received, adopts the same views. At p. 78, vol. v., he says: “I have a strong suspicion that General Ventura’s record of three Sassanian coins having been found below deposit B may be erroneous.”
[108] ‘Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal,’ vol. iii. plate 21, fig. 18.
[109] ‘Foé Koué Ki,’ chap. xiii.
[110] ‘Fa Hian,’ Beal’s translation, p. 32. ‘Hiouen Thsang,’ vol. i. p. 89.
[111] ‘Archæological Reports,’ vol. ii. p. 172.