Also, by the same Author, price 1s.
SUPPLEMENTARY REMARKS ON OUR FOREIGN POLICY.
In One Volume 8vo., price 10s.
OPINIONS of the EUROPEAN PRESS on the EASTERN QUESTION. Translated or Extracted from Turkish, German, French, and English Papers, and Reviews. By David Ross, of Bladensburgh, Esq.
"* * * The papers from the 'Moniteur Ottoman,' in the volume before us, would produce no discredit to our English Journals; they come to us with the strong impress of feeling, and conviction, and truth. We recommend these papers to the special attention of our readers, and we repeat our hopes and our wishes, that the whole contents of this important volume will not remain unexplored by our fellow countrymen."—Scots Times.
"These translations and extracts consist of some of the best Essays and Papers that have been written since the commencement of the year 1835, on the designs of Russia, the conditions and prospects of Turkey, and the power, as well as duties, belonging to certain of the great European kingdoms—England especially, to check the encroachments of the Northern Autocrat. The Editor, from his preface and notes, seems to have been a resident in Turkey for a considerable time, and to possess a thorough acquaintance with the Eastern question. We believe that the works which have been given to the world, on the Eastern question, by the publishers of the present volume, have greatly, nay mainly contributed to the dissemination of sound views on this great subject; nor can we doubt of those collected translations and extracts, so well chosen and edited as they are, tending still further to enlighten the mind and invigorate the arm of England in behalf of freedom and justice, and to the effectual checking of the despot's ambition."—Monthly Review.
ENGLAND and RUSSIA, being a Fifth Edition of England, France, Russia, and Turkey, revised and enlarged, 4s. 6d. boards.
"The action of Russia on Turkey—the treaty of Adrianople, of Unkiar Skelessi—the convention of St. Petersburgh, have been so completely laid bare, in 'England, France, Russia, and Turkey,' that we need offer no remark on the subject; no attempt has been made to controvert any of its positions; no doubt seems even to remain as to their truth. That essay is too succinct to admit of useful citation; it cannot be analysed, because it is itself a condensed analysis of an overwhelming subject. We must content ourselves with urging it on our reader's attention."—British and Foreign Review, No. I.