The cost of constructing irrigating canals varies according to the character of the country. The average in Colorado has been $7 per acre. It is thought by competent engineers that in a general system of canals for the Plains, east of Denver, the cost must run from $10 to $15 per acre. According to careful estimates, Colorado has a water supply sufficient to irrigate 6,000,000 acres, an arable area which, in Egypt, in the times of the Ptolemies, supplied food for 8,000,000 people. The Plains, extending from the foot-hills of the Rocky Mountains eastward nearly 300 miles, comprise about 25,000,000 acres. Of this vast tract there are 1,500,000 acres belonging to the Kansas Pacific Railway Company, lying south of the Platte River, and which a canal from the Platte Cañon to the headwaters of the Republican will cover. Such a canal, 12 feet wide and 3 feet deep, will cost $1,000 per mile. It will make lands that now go a-begging at $2.50 per acre worth from $10 to $15.
The want of water is the one and only drawback to the settlement of the Trans-Missouri country. Farming along the streams has been carried on enough to show that the soil is not only fertile, but extremely so, insuring, with plenty of water, crops surpassing those of the best farming districts elsewhere. The average yield, year in and year out, through the Rocky Mountain region, whenever irrigation is employed, has been found to be as follows: Wheat, 27 bushels per acre; oats, 55; potatoes, 150 to 200; onions, 250; barley, 33. This is far above the average of Illinois or Ohio. It is believed that the mountain streams, if turned into proper channels, will irrigate the greater part of the Plains, both east and west of the Mountains. This is particularly true of Western Kansas and Nebraska, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and New Mexico. The great rivers of the Platte, Arkansas, Rio Grande, and Colorado could be divided at or near their source in the mountains, and made to cover vast quantities of land. In Utah, it is proposed to take out canals from the Jordan, Weber, and Bear rivers, diminishing the supply in Great Salt Lake, and distributing it over other adjacent portions of the territory. And in California, engineers have been sent out to turn the Colorado River into the desert of Arizona, and Southern California.
Page 279.—Her statistics (San Francisco) for 1873 are equally significant, and foot up about as follows: In that year over 70,000 people arrived there, by land and sea, and less than half that number departed. Nearly 4,000 vessels entered her harbor, measuring about 2,000,000 tons. She exported 10,000,000 sacks of wheat, and nearly 1,000,000 barrels of flour; and Californians claimed, it wasn't much of a year for "wheat", either! The total wheat crop of the State, which mostly sought her wharves, was estimated as worth fully $26,000,000, or nearly $10,000,000 more than in 1872—prices being higher; the wool-clip, say, $7,000,000; the wine product, $2,000,000. Her total exports, of all kinds, was estimated at about $80,000,000; and, best of all, while her exports had largely increased, her imports had considerably decreased. Real estate had been dull for a year or two, and yet her sales that year aggregated about $15,000,000; while her mining stocks sold for $150,000,000, and paid dividends about $14,000,000, as against less than half that amount in 1872. The cash value of her property was estimated at $250,000,000 and of the State at about $600,000,000.
California's yield of the precious metals in 1873 was estimated at about $18,000,000, which was some two millions less than in 1872, and was already surpassed by her magnificent wheat crop of $26,000,000. Her total agricultural products for '73 were believed to aggregate $80,000,000; while all her mines and manufactures produced only about $70,000,000, though employing nearly double the number of people. Evidently, with her vast area of 120,000,000 acres of land, of which fully 40,000,000 are fit for the plow, our farmers there have a brilliant future before them, notwithstanding they will have to irrigate to raise some crops.
Page 324.—The following is a table of mean temperature at Santa Barbara for the year 1870-1:
| April, | average of the three daily observations | 60.62° | ||
| May, | " | " | " | 62.35 |
| June, | " | " | " | 65.14 |
| July, | " | " | " | 71.49 |
| Aug., | " | " | " | 72.12 |
| Sept., | " | " | " | 68.08 |
| Oct., | " | " | " | 65.96 |
| Nov., | " | " | " | 61.22 |
| Dec., | " | " | " | 52.12 |
| Jan., | " | " | " | 54.51 |
| Feb., | " | " | " | 53.35 |
| March, | " | " | " | 58.42 |
| Average temperature for the year, 60.20°. | ||||
| COLDEST DAY. | WARMEST DAY. | ||
| April 12th | 60° | April 16th | 74° |
| May 15th | 66 | May 23d | 77 |
| June 1st | 69 | June 3d | 80 |
| July 26th | 76 | July 11th | 84 |
| Aug. 11th | 77 | Aug. 8th | 86 |
| Sept. 23d | 66 | Sept. 27th | 90 |
| Oct. 23d | 60 | Oct. 20th | 92 |
| Nov. 7th | 64 | Nov. 20th | 87 |
| Dec. 15th | 52 | Dec. 28th | 71 |
| Jan. 11th | 56 | Jan. 3d | 76 |
| Feb. 22d | 42 | Feb. 28th | 71 |
| March 13th | 56 | March 27th | 83 |
| Coldest day in the year, Feb. 22d | 42° | ||
| Warmest day in the year, Oct. 20th | 92 | ||
| Variation | 50 | ||