| PAPAL PHYSICIANS. | [431] | |
| The principal Papal Physicians, their careers, and their chiefworks. Ursus, Guy of Montpellier, Ricardus Anglicus, TaddeoFlorentinus, Simon Januensis, William of Brescia, Arnold of Villanova,Petrus Aichspadius, Gentilis Gentilis, Dino del Garbo, Guy de Chauliac,Jean de Tornemire, Francis Casinus, John Baptist Verallus, LudovicusScarampus, Bernard Garzonius, Laurentius Roverella, Joannes Serninus,Simon Tebaldi, Jacobus Gottifredus, Joannes Burgius, Sanctes Floccus,Sebastianus Veteranus, Onofrio de Onofriis, John Philip de Lignamine,Benedict of Nursia, Petrus Leonius, Alexander de Espinosa, GasparTorella, Petrus Pintor, Horatio and Scipio Lancillotti, Joannes Bodier,Samuel Sarfati, Antonius Petrutius, Dioscorides da Velletri,Bartholomeo of Pisa, Bernardinus Speronius, Jerome Sessa, ClementiusClementinus, Bartholomeo Montagnana, Giovanni Antracino, John de Vigo,Francesco Fusconi, Andreas Cibbo, Andrea Turini, Ludovico Augeni,Paulus Jovius, Matteo Corti (Curtius), Antonio Musa Brasavola, SilviusZeffiri, Jacobus Bonacossus, Joannes Manovelli, Thomas Cadimustus,Tiberius Palella, Alfonso Ferri, Franciscus Frigimelica, Maggi, JohnBaptist Cananus, Augustino Ricchi, Altamare, Bianchi, Simon Pasqua,Pompeius Barba, Franciscus Gymnasius, Jerome Cardan, Mercurialis,Placidus Fuscus, Andreas Baccius, Demetrius Canevarius, Malpighi,Jerome Provenzalis, Jerome Rubeus, Jerome Cordella, Zecchius,Caesalpinus, Michael Mercatus, Nicholas Masinus, Jacobus Bonaventura,Julius de Angelis, Pompeius Caimus, Vincentius Crucius, Giovanni andBernardino Castellani, Julius Mancinus, Sylvester and ThaddeusCollicola, Baldus Baldi, Paul Zacchias, Gabriel Fonseca, MatthiasNaldius, Borelli, Lancisi, Salvatorius, Romulus Spezioli, Lucas Tozzi,Morgagni, Cotugno, Giambattista Bomba, Antonio Baccelli, Flajani, PaoloBaroni, Pier Luigi Valentini, Giuseppe Constantini, Castracane,Lapponi, Marchiafava. | ||
APPENDIX VI.
| ASTRONOMY AND THE CHURCH; SOME ROMAN ASTRONOMERS. | [469] | |
| No formal list of Papal astronomers available. The roll of names inastronomy connected in some way with the Popes almost as distinguishedas that of Papal Physicians: Roger Bacon, Albertus Magnus, Nicholas ofCusa, Regiomontanus, Toscanelli, Archbishop Antoninus, Clavius, theRoman College, Scheiner, Ricci, Athanasius Kircher, Thomas Leseur,Franz Jacquier, Boscovitch, Le Maire, Gilii, Beccaria, Piazzi, Secchi,De Vico, Sestini, Denza, Lais, Rodriguez, Hagan. | ||
{xiv}
APPENDIX VII.
| THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH AND SCIENCE. | [484] | |
| Supposed opposition of the Fathers of the Church to science. | ||
| Father Leahy on the true relations. | ||
| Defence of the Fathers. | ||
| Supposed opposition to science. | ||
| No opposition to true science. | ||
| Position as regards astrology. | ||
| What the Fathers did for science. | ||
APPENDIX VIII.
| SCIENCE IN AMERICA. | [492] | |
| Spanish Catholic America far outdistanced English Protestant America in the cultivation of science before our time. | ||
| Professor Bourne, on science at the Spanish-American Universities,"Spanish-American science of the sixteenth century only reached inEnglish America in the nineteenth." | ||
| Dr. Chanca's letter. | ||
| Priority in medical education. | ||
| Bourne on Spanish-American anticipations. | ||
| Reasons for decadence. | ||
APPENDIX IX.
| THE DANGER OF A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE. | [500] | |
| Professor Draper's "History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science." | ||
| The tradition of Church opposition to science founded on ignorance of the Middle Ages. | ||
| The "Bright," not the "Dark" Ages. | ||
| Draper's career. | ||
| "History of the Intellectual Development of Europe." | ||
| Acceptance of his writings as authoritative. | ||
| Lack of scholarship. | ||
| Medieval achievements. | ||
| "Lazy monks." | ||
| Wonderful work of the monks. | ||
| Monasteries as agricultural colleges. | ||
| The Arabs in science. | ||
| Medieval prophylaxis. | ||
| Magnificent hospitals. | ||
| Halley's comet. | ||
| The Popes of the beginning of the Renaissance: Nicholas V, Calixtus III, Pius II (AEneas Sylvius Piccolomini). | ||
| Draper's summaries of history, caricatures. | ||
| Contrast between Spanish and English America. | ||
| Professor Bourne. | ||
| Sir Sidney Lee. | ||
| Professor Draper's philosophy of history. | ||
| The Church and social conditions. | ||
| Draper's surprising ignorance of the history of medicine. | ||
| Objections to the Church in her relations to science always founded on lack of knowledge. | ||