Man has long been recognized as standing in the front rank of susceptibility to tuberculosis. Yet even in his case the prevalence of the affection bears an intimate relation to his indoor life. In large cities post mortems often show that one-third have suffered, and that one-seventh and upward of the whole population die of tuberculosis. Natives of tropical islands and countries, living in the open air and apart from close association with civilized man, often escape entirely. In South Africa the herdsmen living in close buildings suffer encreasingly, while their cattle, kept constantly in the open pasture, escape.
Geographical Distribution. The prevalence of tuberculosis shows a direct relation to the opportunity for infection rather than to climate, latitude or altitude. It is the prevailing disease of civilized communities with dense populations, and especially in large cities where the general vitality is lowered and the crowded buildings give every opportunity for infection. It is preëminently the disease of Central Europe, of Great Britain and of our Eastern States, where there is the greatest activity in business, manufacture and commerce. Yet in the Scottish Hebrides, Iceland, Newfoundland, the Greenland Highlands, Arctic North America, the northern parts of Norway and Sweden, Lapland and Finland it is hardly known. The absence of commerce and cattle and the sparse population have much to do with this. The coasts of Greenland with their Danish stations have two-thirds of the population tuberculous (Cook); the Indians of Barrow’s Straits, when infected in 1899 by the frozen-in whalers, suffered from it as from a plague; in Christiana, Stockholm and St. Petersburg it is as prevalent as in the large cities of Central Europe. Elevated and dry climates have often been found to be free from the affection, yet it prevails inside the double windows of houses in the higher Alps, and has, within a generation established a notorious prevalence in Minnesota, Dakota and westward, as it has in Australia, mainly owing to the advent of consumptives who sought for health in the dry atmosphere. The hills and dry tablelands in North and South America, Africa and Asia which have acquired a reputation for salubrity, owe this largely to the sparse population and the absence of facilities for infection. In South Africa, in spite of the dry and genial climate, the disease is constantly encreasing in the human (housed) population. The sea-coasts, which are the seats of large cities and the centres of population and trade, are also the most extensively affected with tuberculosis—in the West Indian Islands, Panama, Nicaragua, Mexico, Yucatan, Columbia, Equador, Peru, Chili, Ceylon, Guinea coast—while the sparsely peopled highlands of the same countries are practically free.
What is true of man is equally so of cattle. In the Gulf states of this country, herds living in the open air are practically free from tuberculosis, while in New Orleans and other large cities, the cows shut up in the confined stables and yards, are as tuberculous as those of the great cities of the north. So in many districts in the northern states we find no bovine tuberculosis, while in others, differing in no essential particular as regards geological formation, altitude, exposure, and industrial use of the animal, a large proportion are affected.
Virulence. Tuberculosis has long been recognized as virulent. “It is indicated in the Mishna and other Jewish works as rendering the meat unfit for consumption, but to come to more modern times, we find that throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the flesh of tuberculous animals was excluded from human food, alike by the civil and ecclesiastical laws of Europe. Tuberculosis in cattle was erroneously identified with syphilis of man, which made a frightful extension in the end of the fifteenth century, spreading from the army of Charles VIII which had been engaged in the siege of Naples. This conviction lasted until it was disproved about 1782. Though mistaken in the identity of the two diseases, the fact that for centuries the common people and physicians both associated tuberculosis with a malady so notoriously contagious as syphilis, speaks strongly for the forcible evidence of contagion manifested at that time. Morgagni, who must have begun practice about 1700 A. D., testifies to the strong conviction of the contagious element in tuberculosis. Indeed it became a common practice to isolate the consumptive person from the public, and after his death to burn his clothes and sometimes even the house, or at least to subject them to a careful disinfection. It is recorded that in 1750, in Nancy, the magistrates ordered the burning, in the public square, of the personal property of a woman who had died of phthisis, from sleeping in the bed of another consumptive person.
“At Naples, a royal edict of September 20, 1782, prescribed the sequestration of the phthisical, the disinfection of the rooms, chattels, movables, books, etc., with vinegar, eau-de-vie, lemon juice, sea-water, fumigations, etc., under a penalty of three years at the galleys, or in the case of nobles, of three years imprisonment and a fine of 300 ducats. A physician who failed to report a case of consumption was fined 300 ducats for the first offense, and banishment for ten years in case of a second. Any one assisting in such evasion of the law was sent to prison for six months.
“Chateaubriand found that, in 1803, he could not sell his carriages in Rome, because Mme. Beaumont, who had died of consumption, had ridden in them three or four times. George Sand, who was with the phthisical Chopin in Minorca in 1839, was refused a lease of the house for the second month, and the price of repainting and purifying was demanded. Later, in Barcelona, they were assessed for the bed on which Chopin had slept, as the police regulations prescribed it should be burned.
“This was not a mere survival of vulgar prejudice. Jacobi tells us of a dog which died of consumption from eating the sputa of his phthisical master. Laennec, the discoverer of auscultation, and the great authority on pulmonary consumption, records that he himself contracted a tuberculous nodule, through a wound with a saw, while making a necropsy in a case of phthisis. Laennec died of tuberculosis later, although he seemed to have checked this lesion by caustics. Andral joins Laennec in enjoining the greatest caution and cleanliness in taking care of, or associating with persons having advanced tuberculosis.
“Cullen, who started with a strong prejudice against the doctrine of contagion, leaves us the following instance of its occurrence: ‘A young man predisposed to phthisis married a Dutch girl of a sanguine temperament and good constitution. Some days after the marriage the woman lost her fresh color and was attacked by a bad cough; a month later she commenced spitting blood. The physician advised her not to sleep in the same bed with her husband, but she refused to follow his advice, and six months later she died of phthisis. The servant who took care of her and the domestic, who avoided, as far as possible, staying in the sick chamber, both died of consumption.’
“Wickmann, court physician in Hanover, in 1780, pronounces emphatically for contagion. In Zurich, at that time, one death in every six was from phthisis. The contagion of phthisis was slow in its operation, and was, therefore, less evident than that of plague, smallpox, scarlatina and other affections attended by a skin eruption, but it was no less real and deadly. It was also less frequently indirect, or carried from victim to victim by intermediate agents. He cited instances of the transmission of consumption from husband to wife and vice versa, and claimed that the marriage of a phthisical person should be legally prevented. As a means of preventing the disease, he proposed a strict surveillance of establishments for the sale of old clothes, and the avoidance of leaving infants with consumptives.
“Valsalvi and Sarconi refused to make necropsies of persons who had died of phthisis.