In the absence of any systematic and efficient government protection in this line, the stock owner can only protect his sound herd by the rigid exclusion of all animals that are not of his own breeding, or in case of purchase, by an exhaustive inquiry as to the occurrence of sickness or deaths in the herd from which he buys, and by the professional examination and test of every animal to be bought. Even then he must promptly separate, test, and, if necessary destroy any animal that proves unthrifty, or which by cough, diarrhœa, wheezing or other sign gives evidence of probable tuberculosis.
Unregulated Traffic in Tuberculous Animals from Other States. The danger of buying animals untested is in no degree lessened when they are sent in from other states. While some make a business of supplying the store market with what they believe to be good stock, there is always the temptation to turn off animals that are unthrifty or poor milkers and which have proved less profitable than the others. Some even have the herd tested and sell off those that show evidence of tuberculosis. Unless, therefore, it is held in check by the tuberculin test, the traffic is made to the extent of such sales a direct means of disseminating tuberculosis.
ASSORTING THE TUBERCULOUS ANIMALS FOR SALE IN A GIVEN STATE.
A still more injurious result comes from the order of given States, that the admission of store cattle shall be guarded by the tuberculin test of each animal, and the supineness or worse, of adjacent states in establishing no effective safe guard against the disposal of the tuberculous culls in the unprotected State. Cattle from the west or elsewhere in the United States, arrive in a great public market as, for example, New York, they are here tested, those that stand the test are shipped into one of the States requiring the test (Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Canada), and those that have shown the reaction of tuberculosis are sold into the herds of the State in which they were tested. The most malicious enemy of the New York stock owners, could not devise a surer means of stocking the herds of the State with tuberculosis than this atrocious system. Yet when the present writer had a bill introduced into the legislature to correct the evil the opposing interest proved strong enough to prevent it from coming to a vote. The legislative committee on tuberculosis which sat later, and upon whose attention the subject was pressed, also practically ignored it and the statute which this commission inspired leaves the matter as bad as before. Under the present law the New York purchaser must secure his own interests by having every animal he buys tested by a trustworthy veterinarian.
Sale of Sound Animals Concentrates the Tuberculosis. The action of one or more States in admitting store cattle only after a tuberculin test, acts directly in encreasing the relative number of tuberculous animals in adjacent States. The purchaser from Pennsylvania for instance, goes into a New York herd and purchases all the best animals on the condition that they pass the tuberculin test uncondemned. It follows that the New York herd is left with the tuberculous cattle only, and those that, aside from tuberculosis, are of low value or profitless to keep. Further as the advance of tuberculosis is proportionate to the relative number of tuberculous subjects in the herd or building, and the concentration of the poison, the depreciated herd is almost certain to become rapidly and generally affected by the disease.
The Denial of Indemnity for Tuberculous Animals Killed. Several American States (and notoriously New York in the recently enacted statute) forbid compensation to the owner for any animal killed because it is affected with a contagious disease, and to prevent the extension of such contagion. All history attests, and any consideration of human nature might teach, that such a measure is only calculated to spread the infection. The owner of an animal, affected with a contagious disease, who can get little salvage by turning it into beef, and none at all if he hands it over to the State for slaughter, will naturally think of putting it on the market, where he can secure a good price. How much more is he tempted to do this when the disease is an occult one, and the animal shows the outward appearance of health, as is the case in nine-tenths of many tuberculous herds! Crime cannot be fixed on the seller, for he is not an expert, and cannot be expected to diagnose the disease. If the infected cow is of little value for the dairy, she is passed on, from hand to hand, leaving infection in every herd she has entered. The ultimate owner (in whose hands the State finds her and diagnoses her disease), though he may have bought her in good faith as a sound animal and paid a correspondingly high market price, is made to lose the whole value of the cow. The real offender who knew her to be a tuberculous animal, and sold her in consequence at the price of a sound cow is shrewd enough to keep himself out of the clutches of the law, while the honest purchaser who has been already swindled, has his income and property cut off without compensation. Such a law is self-evidently unjust; it plays into the hands of the swindler at the expense of the just man; with the object of protecting the community against infection, it refuses to call on the public for any contribution toward its own protection. The system is a direct bid for extensive and encreasing violation of the law and diffusion of the infection and must be accorded a prominent place in the list of causes. It would be surprising to find that any country ever extirpated an animal plague by working on such a system. As a matter of fact no country ever did; all such sanitary successes from the extinction of sheeppox or rinderpest in Western Europe, to the recent stamping out of lung plague in the United States, were based on a just compensation to the owners of the stock. When, therefore, veterinary sanitary principles and experience have been so far ignored as to allow the passage of a law, which at once favors the diffusion of infection by the crafty sale of the infected, the expatriation of the healthy animals from the home herds, leaving only the diseased, and finally the selection from herds in transit of the tuberculous ones to be scattered widely among the herds of the State, we must not wonder at the continuance or encrease of tuberculosis in the commonwealth. Until a more rational and common sense legislation can be secured, the unfortunate stock owner must defend himself by the expensive alternative of testing every animal he buys.
Private Testing of Herds and Sale of the Tuberculous. A most reprehensible practice is the private testing of herds and the sale as store animals of those that react. In this way a herd may be cleared of infection, but at tenfold expense to the public at large, as every animal sold may convey the infection into a separate herd. It is, however, a natural outcome of the unwise system of refusing indemnity for the infected.
Habituating to Tuberculin Testing and then Selling under Test. Many (not all) cattle, when injected with tuberculin repeatedly at short intervals, acquire a tolerance of the agent and fail to react as at the first test. We have in such cases examined the animals post mortem and found active tuberculosis. Unscrupulous owners, aware of the fact, have their diseased cattle injected repeatedly every few weeks, and as soon as they fail to respond, sell them under the guarantee of the tuberculin test. The cattle, of course, carry the infection into other herds. This swindle could be obviated if it could be made a misdemeanor to have or use tuberculin except as a State or Federal official acting for the government. This would imply the corollary that the State should test the herds when called upon.
Antipyretics During Tuberculin Test. Another method of undoing the tuberculin test is to feed large doses of antithermic agents to depress the temperature at the time the rise from tuberculin would take place. Tuberculous cattle may thus be sold as sound animals, with a certificate of having successfully passed the tuberculin test, the operator having given such certificate in perfect good faith. It suggests the importance of withholding tuberculin from public use, or of securing an absolute control of the feeding and watering of the animals during the test.
False Certificates of Tuberculin Tests. Stock owners have reported to the writer alleged tuberculin tests of their herds which were completed in three hours, and others have named instances of marking animals for shipment and giving certificates of testing where no tuberculin had been used and no examination beyond the most cursory glance had been made. This might be expected of some non-graduates, registered on a basis of alleged practice, shamefully ignorant of veterinary medicine and conscious of their false position, and some educated veterinarians thus placed at a disadvantage may have been tempted to follow suit, but it can only end in personal disgrace and an inevitable extension of tuberculosis. Begotten in a legislative wrong and nourished by moral weakness, it can only grow into greater evil. Unfortunately such unworthy actions throw discredit on the very name of sanitary police. To avoid the evil every one aspiring to the responsible work of testing cattle should be thoroughly examined as to fitness and licensed to practice under a heavy penalty for neglect or malpractice.