[44] Briggs’ Farishtah, IV. 236. [↑]
[46] Farishtah Pers. Text, II. 504–505. [↑]
[47] Farishtah Pers. Text, II. 505. [↑]
[48] Farishtah Pers. Text, II. 507. [↑]
[49] Wákiăt-i-Mushtáki in Elliot, IV. 554–556. Probably these are stock tales. The Gujarát historians give Muzaffar and Muhammad the Gold-giver (a.d. 1441–1451) credit for the horse scrupulosity. See Mirăt-i-Sikandari Pers. Text, 178. [↑]
[50] Briggs’ Farishtah, IV. 236–239; Wákiăt-i-Jehángíri in Elliot, VI. 349–350; Wákiăt-i-Mushtáki in Elliot, IV. 554–55; Malcolm’s Central India, I. 35–36. The Mirăt-i-Sikandari (Pers. Text, 160) has the following notice of Ghiás-ud-dín: The Sultáns of Mándu had reached such a pitch of luxury and ease that it is impossible to imagine aught exceeding it. Among them Sultán Ghiás-ud-dín was so famous for his luxurious habits, that at present (a.d. 1611) if any one exceeds in luxury and pleasure, they say he is a second Ghiás-ud-dín. The orders of the Sultán were that no event of a painful nature or one in which there was any touch of sadness should be related to him. They say that during his entire reign news of a sad nature was only twice conveyed to him: once when his son-in-law died and once when his daughter was brought before him clothed in white. On this occasion the Sultán is related to have simply said: “Perhaps her husband is dead.” This he said because the custom of the people of India is that when the husband of a woman dies she gives up wearing coloured clothes. The second occasion was when the army of Sultán Bahlol Lodi plundered several of the districts of Chanderi. Though it was necessary to report this to the Sultán, his ministers were unable to communicate it to him. They therefore asked a band of actors (bhánds) to assume the dress of Afgháns, and mentioning the districts to represent them as being pillaged and laid waste. Sultán Ghiás-ud-dín exclaimed in surprise: “But is the governor of Chanderi dead that he does not avenge upon the Afgháns the ruin of his country!” [↑]
[51] Compare Catalogue of Indian Coins, The Mahomedan States, pages LIV. LV. and 118–121. [↑]
[52] Farishtah Pers. Text, II. 507. [↑]
[53] Farishtah (Pers. Text, II. 508) detailing how Násir-ud-dín came to power, says: There was a difference between Násir-ud-dín and his brother Alá-ud-dín. The mother of these princes, Khurshíd Ráni, who was the daughter of the Hindu chief of Báglána, had taken Alá-ud-dín the younger brother’s side. After killing his father Násir-ud-dín ordered his mother to be dragged out of the harím and Alá-ud-dín and his children to be slaughtered like lambs. [↑]