[128] Tuhfat-ul-Kirám in Elliot, I. 344. [↑]
[129] Táríkh-i-Maâsumi in Elliot, I. 217. [↑]
[130] Tárikh-i-Maâsumi in Elliot, I. 218. [↑]
[131] Tárikh-i-Táhiri (Elliot’s History of India), I. 267–68. [↑]
[132] Journal Asiatic Society of Bengal for February 1838, 102. [↑]
[133] Sir Henry Elliot’s History of India, I. 268. [↑]
[134] Tárikh-i-Fírúz Sháhi in Elliot, II. 260. [↑]
[135] In his Arabic Text of the Murúj (Prairies D’Or, Cairo Edition) Al Masúdi writes the name of the Kanauj king as Farwarah. (If the F stands for P and the w for m, as is quite possible in Arab writing, then this can be Parmárah the Arab plural for Parmár.) At volume I. page 240 the word Farwarah is twice used. Once: “And the king of Kanauj, of the kings of Sindh (India) is Farwarah.” Again at the same page (240): “And Farwarah he who is king of Kanauj is opposed to Balhara.” Then at page 241: Farwarah is again used in the beginning of the account quoted by Elliot in I. 23. [↑]
[136] Elliot’s History of India, I. 23. In the Cairo Edition of the Arabic Text of Al Masúdi’s Murúj (Prairies D’Or) vol. I. page 241 is the original of this account. [↑]