[964]. Ibid., pp. 200 f.; Randolph Papers, vol. III, p. 60.
[965]. The difference in the two methods was then beginning to be understood and was clearly brought out in a discussion in Carolina in 1685. Cal. State Pap., Col., 1685-88, pp. 12 f.
[966]. Maitland, Constitutional History, p. 239.
[967]. Cal. State Pap., Col., 1669-74, p. 475. Cf., also, The Groans of the Plantations (London, 1689), p. 23. “Our Masters the Projectors think they have a great advantage over us, in regard we have none to represent us in Parliament. 'Tis true, we have not: but we hope we may have them. It is no disparagement to the Kingdom of Portugall, rather it is the only thing that looks great; that in that assembly of their Estates the Deputies of the City of Goa have their place among their other cities.”
[968]. Randolph Papers, vol. III, pp. 50, 68.
[969]. Ibid., pp. 48 ff.
[970]. Ibid., vols. III, pp. 60, 70 ff., 86, and VI, pp. 99 ff.; Cal. State Pap., Col., 1677-80, pp. 372 f.; Records of the Court of Assistants of Massachusetts Bay (Boston, 1901), vol. I, pp. 149 f., 160, 168, 171, 176 f., et passim.
[971]. Massachusetts Records, vol. V, pp. 268, 263.
[972]. Massachusetts Records, vol. V, pp. 268, 286, 278, 287 ff.
[973]. Randolph Papers, vol. III, pp. 81 ff.