[1042]. Of the modern scientific historians, Professor Channing is, perhaps, the one who takes the most unfavorable view of Andros. History, vol. II, pp. 180 ff. Cf., however, Osgood, American Colonies, vol. III, pp. 394 ff., and Kimball, Dudley, pp. 43 f. The change in attitude toward Andros, which dates from the publication of the Andros Tracts in 1868, does not seem to me to be as much invalidated by the later publication of the Andros Records as Professor Channing considers.
[1043]. N. Y. Col. Docts., vol. III, p. 235.
[1044]. Colonial Society Massachusetts Publications, vol. II, p. 46; Organic Acts for the Territories of the United States (Senate Doct. No. 148, 56th Congress, 1st Sess.), p. 18.
[1045]. Andros Tracts, vol. I, pp. 140 ff.
[1046]. Andros Records, in American Antiquarian Society Proceedings, N. S., vol. XIII, pp. 239, 483.
[1047]. Randolph Papers, vol. VI, p. 218.
[1048]. Reinsch, English Common Law, p. 11; Andros Tracts, vol. I, p. 88.
[1049]. Conn. Col. Records, vol. III, pp. 177 f. Cf. C. J. Hoadly, Hiding of the Charter (Acorn Club, 1900), pp. 14 f.
[1050]. New Hampshire Laws, vol. I, pp. 159 f., 162.
[1051]. Cal. State Pap., Col., 1681-85, pp. 22, 386, 527; supra, chap. XV; Dudley Records, p. 276.