[394]. Bradford, Plymouth, p. 310.
[395]. J. Winthrop, History, vol. I, p. 194.
[396]. Ibid., vol. I, p. 195.
[397]. Massachusetts Records, vol. I, p. 161.
[398]. J. Winthrop, History, vol. I, p. 209.
[399]. Besides his works already referred to, his doctrine of religious liberty found expression in The Bloody Tenent of Persecution, 1644, and The Bloody Tenent yet more Bloody, 1652, reprinted as vols. III and IV of the Narr. Club Pub.
[400]. Cf., however, besides the standard histories, J. L. Diman, Preface to Narragansett Club Publications, vol. II, pp. 1-8; and Dexter, As to Roger Williams. The latter is strongly biased against Williams, and contains some untenable views as to the founders' attitude toward the charter, but is useful as citing almost all known references to the case. It was critically reviewed by H. S. Burrage, American Historical Association Report, 1899, vol. I, pp. 10-12.
[401]. J. Winthrop, History, vol. I, p. 255.
[402]. The modern literature regarding the Antinomian controversy is large. Cf. C. F. Adams, Antinomianism in the Colony of Massachusetts Bay; Prince Society, Boston, 1894; also his Three Episodes, vols. I, pp. 363, and II, 533-81. A very lucid account is given by R. N. Jones, The Quakers in the American Colonies (London, 1911), pp. 4-25.
[403]. J. Winthrop, History, vol. I, pp. 211 ff.