Hence the practical farmer sees the reason why no one simple manure can long answer on the same land; and why in all ages and countries the habit of employing mixed manures and artificial composts has been universally diffused.
SECTION IV.—NATURAL DISTINCTION OR DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN ANIMAL AND VEGETABLE MANURES,
AND THE CAUSE OF THIS DIFFERENCE.
In what do animal manures differ from vegetable manures,—what is the cause of this difference,—how does the digestion of vegetable matter improve its value as a manure?
1. The characteristic distinction between animal and vegetable manures is this,—that the former contain a much larger proportion of nitrogen than the latter. This will be seen at once, by comparing together the tables given in the two preceding sections, in which the numbers represent the relative agricultural values of certain animal and vegetable substances compared with farm-yard manure. The lowest numbers represent the highest value, and the largest amount of nitrogen, and these low numbers are always opposite to the purest animal substances.
2. In consequence of containing so much nitrogen, animal substances are further distinguished by the rapidity with which, when moist, they putrify or run to decay. During this decay the nitrogen they contain gradually assumes the form of ammonia, which is perceptible by the smell, and which, when proper precautions are not taken, is apt in great part to escape into the air. Hence the loss by fermenting manure too completely,—or without proper precautions to prevent the escape of volatile substances. And as animal manure, when thus over-fermented, or permitted to lose its ammonia into the air, is found much less active upon vegetation than before; it is reasonably concluded, that to this ammonia, chiefly, their peculiar virtue, when rightly prepared, is in a great measure to be ascribed.
Vegetable substances do not decay so rapidly,—do not emit the odour of ammonia when fermenting,—nor, when prepared in the most careful way, does vegetable manure exhibit the same remarkable action upon vegetable life as is displayed by almost every substance of animal origin.
3. Whence do animal substances derive all this nitrogen? Animals live only upon vegetable productions containing little nitrogen; can they then procure all they require from this source alone? Again, does the act of digestion produce any chemical alteration upon the food of animals, that their excretions should be a better manure,—should be richer in nitrogen than the substances on which they feed? Does theory throw any light upon the opinion generally entertained among practical men upon this point?
These two apparently distinct questions will be explained by a brief reference to one common natural principle.
Animals have two necessary vital functions to perform,—to breathe and to digest. Both are of equal importance to the health and general welfare of the animal. The digester (the stomach) receives the food, melts it down, extracts from it what is best suited to its purposes, and conveys it into the blood. The breathers (the lungs) sift the blood thus mixed up with the newly digested food, combine oxygen with it, and extract carbon,—which carbon, in the form of carbonic acid, they discharge by the mouth and nostrils into the air.
Such is a general description of these two great processes,—their effect upon the food that remains in the body and has to be rejected from it, is not difficult to perceive.