As regards your spelling—
("Ah! here he leads again with his left, and gets one in,—low,
Bev, low!")
As regards your spelling, as you know, I admire originality in all things; but it has, hitherto, been universally conceded that the word "eliminate" shall not and cannot begin with the letters i-l-l! "Vanquish" does not need a k. "Apathy" is spelled with but one p— while never before have I beheld "anguish" with a w.
("Now, Bev, that's what I call coming it a bit too strong!" sighed the Viscount, shaking his head; "'anguish' is anguish however you spell it! And, as for the others, let me tell you when a fellow has a one-eyed being with bristles hanging about his place, he isn't likely to be over particular as to his p's and q's, no, damme! Let's see, where were we? ah! here it is,—'anguish' with a 'w'!")
I quite agree with your remarks, viz. that a father's duties to
his son are sacred and holy—
("This is where I counter, Bev, very neatly,—listen! He quite agrees that,—")
—a father's duties to his son are sacred and holy, and not to be lightly esteemed, blinked, or set aside—
("Aha! had him there, Bev,—inside his guard, eh?")
I also appreciate, and heartily endorse your statement that it is to his father that a son should naturally turn for help—
("Had him again—a leveller that time, egad!")