LETTER XXXI.
OF TWINS, TRIPLETS, ETC.
Twins, Triplets, and Quadrigemini of comparatively rare Occurrence—Of the Signs of two or more Children in the Womb—Management of Twin and Triplet Cases—The Nursing of Twins.
It sometimes happens that the woman gives birth to two or more children at the same time. When a mother has twins it is usually the case that both children are smaller than the natural size; they are not, however, both of the same weight; one may be of moderate size, while the other is still more diminutive. But cases have been known to occur, in which both children were above the natural standard. The average weight of twelve twins, examined by Dr. Clarke, as quoted by Dr. Burns, was eleven pounds the pair, or five and a half pounds each, bringing each child considerably under the average weight of a child born singly. Usually the two children, taken together, weigh considerably more than the one at a single birth.
Twins are fortunately of comparatively rare occurrence; so much so as to render it difficult to establish the proportion between them and single births; the cause of their production is evidently mysterious, and altogether beyond the power of human control.
In the Middlesex Hospital, London, according to Dr. Dewees, there was on an average but one case of twins in about ninety-one of births. In Dublin the proportion is greater; in the hospital of that city it was found that one woman in fifty-eight had twins; in the Westminster Hospital, in London, one in eighty; in Dr. Burns’ practice, one in ninety-five; in La Maison d’Accouchement, in Paris, there were, in twenty years, thirty-seven thousand, four hundred and forty-one single births, and four hundred and forty-four twins; in the l’Hospice de la Maternité (Hospital of Maternity) of Paris, the proportion was about one in eighty-eight, according to one return, but according to the testimony of Madame Boivin, of the same institution, the proportion was only one in about one hundred and thirty or forty, while in that of La Maison d’Accouchement the proportion was about one in ninety-one. Dr. Dewees regards, that in this country the proportion of twin cases is, on an average, one in seventy-five. In Wurtemberg, in Germany, there were, according to Dr. Burns, twins once in about eighty-six cases of births.
Triplets.—These are very much more rare than twins. In the returns of the cases in La Maison d’Accouchement, as furnished by Baudelocque, there appears to have been but one in more than eight thousand cases; in the returns of Madame Boivin, of the cases in the l’Hospice de la Maternité, there is one in rather less than seven thousand. In La Maison d’Accouchement there were, according to Dr. Burns, in twenty years, thirty-seven thousand four hundred and forty-one single births, and five triplets. At Wurtemberg, in Germany, there were triplets once in about seven thousand.
Quadrigemini.—Instances of four children at a birth must be exceedingly rare. It is not uncommon to find the announcement of such cases in our public prints; but the truth of these ought evidently to be questioned in most cases; and yet such an occurrence has been known to take place. An instance was said, on good authority, to have occurred in Paris, in October, 1823. Dr. Dewees cites a German author, as giving the case of a woman in Strasburg, who had eleven children at three deliveries, making, of course, four of each at two of the births, and three at the other. The same author quotes from the Albany Argus what he designates an account of “unparalleled fecundity.” Dr. O. F. Paddock, a respectable physician of Fort Covington, Franklin County, gives, in the Franklin Telegraph, an account of an extraordinary birth of five children at one time, from the same mother—three daughters and two sons. Four of them were born alive, but lived a short time. The birth was premature three months, but they were perfectly well-formed and well-shaped. The average weight was about two pounds, and not much difference in their size. Their parents had lately emigrated from Ireland, and arrived in this country in August, 1825. This case is rendered more remarkable by the fact that the mother of these five was delivered, on the 20th of February, 1826, of two; making, in the whole, seven children in less than nine months. The last were born on the 25th November, of the same year.
The same author quotes also another account of remarkable fertility from Dr. Ryan, editor of the London Medical and Surgical Journal. This learned gentleman was called to a patient, aged forty-one, of a sanguine temperament, who had menstruated at the age of twelve, and married between eighteen and nineteen. She had a seven months’ child in the eighth month of her marriage; had twins about the fourth month three times during the year 1829, and again, December 31, when she was attended by Mr. Whitemore, of Cold Bath Fields, and delivered of two infants; and on January 28th, 1830, she was attended by Mr. Thomas, of Bagnigge Wells Road, and delivered of an infant, which he considered of the same age as the preceding. On the seventh of June, 1830, she aborted at the third month; and on the ninth, a second fetus was expelled; and as there was no discharge whatever from that time to the period when Dr. Ryan wrote, she considered herself still pregnant. The abdomen was about the size of a woman’s in the fifth month of utero-gestation. She had twenty-four children in twenty-one years, and menstruated regularly before marriage, and was always in good health when suckling, and ill when breeding; and always became pregnant about the fifth month of lactation. Her mother was seventy years of age, and in good health; she had eighteen children born alive. A relation of her husband had thirty-two children, including miscarriages.
Dr. Dewees gave a case some years since, of a lady with whom he conversed, who was then in her thirty-eighth year, and who declared to him that she had been pregnant two-and-thirty times. Of this number eleven children had been born alive, and at the full time. She repeatedly miscarried of twins, and no abortion was less than near three months. She had been married nearly twenty-three years.
As regards the number of fetuses that may exist in the womb at a time, fable has exerted itself to an almost endless extent; thus, the story of the Countess of Hannenberg may be cited as an instance. She, in consequence of a curse pronounced by a beggar-woman, to whom she had refused money, was delivered of three hundred and sixtyfive fetuses; that is, one for every day in the year, in fulfillment of the wish of the offended mendicant, which was, “that she might have as many children at a birth as there are days in the year.” The curse was said to be accomplished; and, in proof of it, the fetuses are shown to strangers that visit the museum at Leyden. This fable did very well for the year 1276; but, if such cases were said to happen now, they would be more scrupulously investigated, and more rationally accounted for. In the case first noticed, the sexes were pretended to be discoverable, and all the males were called John, and all the females Elizabeth, at their baptism.