[641]. For the opinion of the Judges on the question of penetration, arising out of this case, see Hutt. R. 115.
[642]. The doubt in this case arose on the construction of the Statute 2 & 3 Ph. & M. c. 10. See also Lambe’s case, 2 Leach’s C.L. 626.
Transcriber’s Note
This print copy of the book had front matter labelled with small Roman numerals followed by an Introduction also labelled with small Roman numerals and beginning again with ‘i’. In this e-book version, the page numbers of the front matter have been suffixed with _a (i.e. i_a) and the page numbers of the Introduction have been suffixed with _b (i.e. i_b), in order to differentiate them.
This book uses inconsistent spelling and hyphenation, which were retained in the ebook version. Ditto marks and dashes used to represent repeated text have been replaced with the text that they represent. Some corrections have been made to the text, including correcting the [errata] noted, normalizing punctuation and correcting page numbers in the table of contents where errors were found. Further corrections are noted below:
p. [v_b]: weight of a religious ordonannce -> weight of a religious ordinance
[Footnote 41]: Cours de Médicine -> Cours de Médecine
p. [xxxvi_b]: Sir Henry’s Presidentcy -> Sir Henry’s Presidency
p. [xlvii_b]: a sign of independant vitality -> a sign of independent vitality
[Footnote 75]: suggested that Cardinel Wolsey -> suggested that Cardinal Wolsey