COURTESY OF ENGINEERING
OLYMPIC AND TITANIC 1912
LUSITANIA 1906
GREAT EASTERN 1858
CAMPANIA 1893
PARIS 1868
A Comparison of Bulkhead Protection in Some Notable Ships
The wisdom of this construction was demonstrated years later, when, as a result of an accident to her engines, the two largest adjoining compartments of the City of Paris were flooded, at a time when the ship was 150 miles off the coast of Ireland. There was no wireless in those days to send out its call for help, and for three days the ship drifted in a helpless condition. Thanks to her lofty bulkheads, the good ship stood the ordeal and was finally brought into port without the loss of a single passenger.
BULKHEAD SPACING ON NOTABLE SHIPS
| NAME | Date of Building | Registered Length, Feet[1] | No. of Main W. T. Bulkheads | Average Length of Compart- ments | Per cent. of Length |
| Titanic | 1911 | 852.5 | 15 | 53 | 6.2 |
| Lusitania | 1907 | 762.0 | 16 | 45 | 5.9 |
| George Washington | 1908 | 699.0 | 13 | 50 | 7.1 |
| Great Eastern | 1854-59 | 680.0 | 9 | 68 | 10.0 |
| Carmania | 1905 | 650.0 | 15 | 50 | 7.8 |
| Campania | 1893 | 601.0 | 8 | 67 | 11.1 |
| New York | 1888 | 517.0 | 14 | 37 | 6.7 |
| Alma | 1894 | 270.7 | 11 | 23 | 8.3 |