The books of St. Giles’ parish furnish the following extracts:—

1641.

Received of the Vintner at the Catt in Queene Streete, for p’mitting of tipling on the Lord’s day

£1100
1644.

Received of three poor men, for drinking on the Sabbath daie at Tottenham Court

£040
1646.

Received of Mr. Hooker, for brewing on a Fast day

026
1648.

Received from Isabel Johnson, at the Cole Yard, for drinking on the sabbath day

040
1655.

Received of a Mayd taken in Mrs. Jackson’s Ale-house on the sabbath day

050

Received of a Scotchman drinking at Robert Owen’s on the Sabbath

020
1658.

Received of Joseph Piers, for refusing to open his doores to have his house searched on the Lord’s daie

0100

In 1641, an amusing pamphlet was published on the subject of Sunday closing. Its title, frontispiece, and an extract from its contents are given on the opposite page.

About this period was in vogue that curious old form of punish­ment which was known as the drunkard’s, or Newcastle, cloak. This gar­ment was noth­ing more nor less than a beer bar­rel, worn in the man­ner shown in the ac­comp­any­ing il­lus­tra­tion. Possibly the in­ven­tor of sand­wich men de­rived his idea from this source.

Locke, in his second letter on Tol­er­a­tion, informs us that the in­tol­er­ance of the age with regard to Dis­sent was car­ried to such length that hardly any walk in life was free from ob­sta­cles thrown in the way of Dis­sent­ers pursuing it. Amongst other things he men­tions that those who had licences to sell ale were compelled to receive the Sac­ra­ment ac­cord­ing to the rites of the Church of England. We are unable to find in con­temp­orary records any con­fir­mation of this alleged regulation.

Cook.—“There is ſuch news in the world will anger thee to heare of, it is as bad, as bad may be.”

Froth.—“Is there ſo? I pray thee what is it, tell me whatever it be.”

Cook.—“Have you not heard of the reſtraint lately come out againſt us, from the higher powers; whereby we are commanded not to ſell meat nor draw drink upon Sundays, as will anſwer the contrary at our perils.”