[2] Hemingford says, that there were fifty thousand slain, many drowned, and three hundred thousand foot taken prisoners, besides a thousand horsemen.
[3] Hist. Lib. iv. c. 15.
[4] Appendix to Blair’s Relationes in the Library of the College of Glasgow.
[5] Scottish Historical Library, p. 68. quarto ed.
[6] In England, Thomas à Becket conceded to Henry II., that, in the event of a bondsman becoming a clerk, he should not receive orders without the consent of his lord; and further, if a man of holy church held any lay-fee, he must do the King’s service thereto attached, except in cases connected with the execution of criminals. See Hearne’s Glossary to Langtoft’s Chronicle, vol. ii. p. 530.
[7] Macpherson’s Annals of Commerce, vol. i. p. 324.
[8] Fordun, vol. ii. lib. x. cap. 42.
[9] Fordun, vol. ii. lib. x. cap. 42.—If we compare the following provisions of an act put forth by Edward I., with the above-mentioned enactment, some idea may be formed respecting the views entertained by the two British monarchs, on the subject of foreign commercial intercourse. “It is ordained, that no fishmonger shall have any partnership with a stranger who brings fish from sea to the city; but let them seek for fish in their own ships, and permit foreigners to bring it and sell, when they come in their own ships. Because, by such partnerships, they who are of the city, and have known the state of the city, and the defect of victuals, will hold the fish at a dearer rate than foreigners, who shall not have known it; and also, that they who are of the city, when they cannot sell, as they will lay it up in cellars, and sell it dearer than the strangers would do, if they came without partnership, and knew not where they might be harboured.”—Lambert’s Historical Survey of London, vol. i. p. 156, 157.
[10] Fœdera, vol. i. p. 467.
[11] Torfæi Orcades, lib. i. cap. 4.