[65] William Whewell, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, London, 1840.
[66] The essential similarity between Whewell's view and that of Lotze, already discussed (see chap. 3) is of course explainable on the basis of their common relationship to Kant.
[67] Logic, Book IV, chap. 2, sec. 2; italics mine.
[68] Ibid.
[69] Ibid., sec. 4; in sec. 6 he states even more expressly that any conception is appropriate in the degree in which it "helps us toward what we wish to understand."
[70] Ibid., sec. 6; italics mine.
[71] Venn, Empirical Logic, p. 383.
[72] Venn, Empirical Logic, p. 25; italics mine.
[73] Welton, Manual of Logic, Vol. II, chap. 3.
[74] W. S. Jevons, Principles of Science, pp. 231, 232.