ib. line 30, for conjesta read congesta.
ib. line 31, for susuperavit read superavit.
Page [231], line 11, for Jude read Inde: for ferucat read ferueat.
Page [245], line 7, for whosc read whose.
Several errors and inaccuracies of less consequence than those here pointed out, will probably be discovered. These were occasioned by the editor's distance from the press, and he requests the gentle reader to pardon and correct them.
Transcriber's note:
Despite a valiant effort to the contrary some additional transcription errors may have slipped through during the preparation of this e-text. We can't blame the distance between the editor and the press. Please forward any corrections to Project Gutenberg errata.
The Inscription, No. [x]. of the Appendix, should have been entirely omitted. The following extract from Guillim's Heraldry, shews that Bishop Earle could not have been connected with the Streglethorp family, since, if he had, there would have been no occasion for a new grant of armorial bearings.
"He beareth ermine, on a chief indented sable, three eastern crowns or, by the name of Earles. This coat was granted by Sir Edward Walker, garter, the 1st of August, 1660, to the Reverend Dr. John Earles, son of Thomas Earles, gent, sometime Register of the Archbishop's Court at York. He was Dean of Westminster, and Clerk of the Closet to his Majesty King Charles the Second; and in the year 1663, made Bishop of Salisbury."
Guillim's Heraldry, folio. Lond. 1724. p. 282.
It is almost unnecessary to add that I was not aware of this grant, when I compiled the short account of Earle, at page [186], and spoke of my inability to give any information relative to his parents.