[584]. Christologia, loc. cit.
[585]. Credibility of the Gospel History. Supplement, ch. xxi.
[586]. “It seems very unlikely that St. Jude should write so similar an epistle, if he had seen St. Peter’s. In that case, St. Jude would not have thought it needful for him to write at all. If he had formed a design of writing, and had met with an epistle of one of the apostles, very suitable to his own thoughts and intentions, I think he would have forborne to write.”—Cred. loc. cit.
[587]. Michaelis’ Introd. to the N. T. ch. xxix. sec. 2.
[588]. Eichhorn’s Einleitung in das neue Testament, viii. 3.
[589]. Dr. J. L. Hug’s Introduction to the New Testament: translated by Dr. Wait. Sec. 169, 170.
[590]. Marsh’s Michaelis, ch. xxviii. sec. 1; ch. xxix. sec. 2, 5.
[591]. Einleitung in d. N. T. viii. 3.
[592]. Marsh’s Michaelis, ch. xxix. sec. 4.
[593]. For a sufficient refutation of Lardner’s interpretation, see the last-cited section of Marsh’s Michaelis.