SPEAKERS OF THE IRISH HOUSE OF COMMONS SINCE THE RESTORATION.

1661, Sir Audley Mervin; 1692, Sir R. Levinge, H.M.’s Solicitor-General; 1695, Rt. Hon. Robert Rochfort, Attorney-General; 1703, Broderick Allen; 1710, Hon. John Forster; 1715, Rt. Hon. Wm. Connolly; 1729, Sir Ralph Gore; 1733, Hon. Henry Boyle (Lord Shannon); 1756, Rt. Hon. John Ponsonby; 1771, Rt. Hon. Edmund Sexton Pery (Lord Pery); 1785, Rt. Hon. John Foster.

CHIEF SECRETARIES TO LORD LIEUTENANTS.

Year.Chief Secretary.Lord Lieutenant.
1703.Sir E. Southwell (also Principal Secretary of State).Duke of Ormonde.
1707.Joshua Dawson.Lord Pembroke.
1709.George Bubb Doddington (also Clerk of the Pells).Lord Wharton.
1711.—— Southwell.Duke of Ormonde again.
1713.Sir John Stanley.Duke of Shrewsbury.
1724.Thomas Clutterbuck.Lord Carteret.
1731.Walter Carey.Duke of Dorset.
1738.Edward Walpole, and Nicholas Bonfoy. (This was
the Mr. Walpole who had the escapade with the
notorious Letitia Pilkington).
Duke of Devonshire.
1740.Henry Legg, and Nicholas Bonfoy.Do. Do.
1742.Lord Duncannon and Nicholas Bonfoy, Esq.Do. Do.
1745.B. Liddell (a Cornish M.P.), and William Bristow.Lord Chesterfield.
1747.—— Wayte.Lord Harrington.
1751.Lord G. Sackville (also Clerk of the Council, and
Keeper of Phœnix Park).
Duke of Dorset again.
1755.Robert Maxwell.Marquis of Hartington.
1757.Richard Rigby (also Master of the Rolls).Duke of Bedford.
1761.“Single Speech” Hamilton (also Chancellor of the
Exchequer).
Lord Halifax.
1763.Hamilton again, and Lord Drogheda.Lord Northumberland.
1765.Edward Thurlow.Lord Weymouth, who did
not come.
1765.Lord Beauchamp.Lord Hertford.
1766.Lord Aug. Hervey.Lord Bristol (did not come).
1767.Sir G., afterwards Lord McCartney (Governor of
Madras), and Lord Fk. Campbell.
Marquis Townshend.
1772.Sir John Blacquiere (also Alnager, and afterwards
Lord Blacquiere).
Lord Hartcourt.
1777.Sir Rd. Heron (his Excellency’s land agent; also
Searcher, Packer, and Gauger of the Port of
Cork).
Lord Buckinghamshire.
1780.W. Eden (afterwards Lord Auckland).Lord Carlisle.
1782.Colonel Fitzpatrick.Duke of Portland.
"Lord Grenville (also Chief Remembrancer, with
£4,000 a year).
Lord Temple, Buckingham.
1783.Thomas Pelham and William Wyndham.Lord Northington.
1784.Thomas Orde (afterwards Lord Bolton).Duke of Rutland.
1787.Alleyne Fitzherbert (afterwards Lord St. Helens).Marquis of Buckingham again.
1790.Major Hobart (afterwards Lord
Buckinghamshire).
Lord Westmoreland.
1795.Syl. Douglas (Lord Glenbervie).Lord Fitzwilliam.
"G. Damer (afterwards Lord Milton). T. Pelham
(afterwards Lord Chichester).
Lord Camden.
1798.Lord Castlereagh.Lord Cornwallis.
1801.Charles Abbott (afterwards Speaker of English
House of Commons, and Lord Colchester); W.
Wickham; Sir Evan Napean (Treasurer of Irish
Exchequer); Nicholas Vansittart (afterwards
Lord Bexley); Charles Long (afterwards Lord
Farnborough).
Lord Hardwick.
1801.W. Elliott.Duke of Bedford.
1807.Sir A. Wellesley, Robert Dundas (afterwards Lord
Melville), Wellesley Pole (also Chancellor of the
Irish Exchequer, and afterwards Lord
Maryborough).
Duke of Richmond.
1812.Sir R. Peel.Lord Whitworth.
1818.Charles Grant (Lord Glenleg).Lord Talbot.
1821.Henry Goulburn.Marquis Wellesley.
1827.W. Lamb (Lord Melbourne).Do. Do.
1828.Lord F. Levenson Gower (Lord Ellesmere).Marquis of Anglesey and
Duke of Northumberland.
1830.Sir H. Hardinge (afterwards Lord Hardinge).Marquis of Anglesey again.
"Edward Stanley (Lord Derby).Do. Do.
1833.Cam Hobhouse, E. J. Littleton (Lord Hatherton.)Marquis of Wellesley again.
1834.Sir H. Hardinge again.Lord Haddington, and Lord
Mulgrave, and Lord
Fortescue.
"G. F. W. Howard (Lord Carlisle).
1841.Lord Elliott (Earl St. Germains).Lord De Grey.
1845.Sir Thos. Freemantle.Lord Heytesbury.
1846.Lord Lincoln.Lord Bessborough.
"Henry Labouchere.Do. Do.
1847.Sir William Somerville.Lord Clarendon.
1853.Lord Naas.Lord Eglinton.
1854.Sir John Young.Lord St. Germains.
1855.Edward Horsman, and Hon. H. Herbert.Lord Carlisle.
1858.Lord Naas.Lord Eglinton again.
1860.Edward Cardwell.Lord Carlisle again.
1862.Sir R. Peel.Lord Carlisle.
1865.Do. Do.Lord Kimberley.
1866.Chichester Fortescue (afterwards Lord
Carlingford).
Do. Do.
1867.Lord Naas (afterwards Lord Mayo).Duke of Abercorn.
1868.Chichester Fortescue again.Lord Spencer.
1871.Marquis of Hartington.Do. Do.
1873.Sir M. H. Beach.Duke of Abercorn again.
1879.James Lowther.Duke of Marlborough.
1880.W. E. Forster.Lord Cowper.

N.B.—It is instructive to note how very few of the here-mentioned eighty Chief Secretaries, the persons mainly entrusted with the government of the country for 180 years, belonged to the country, or had any real knowledge of its condition and requirements. If the other kingdoms of the earth were administered on this principle, the “quam parvâ sapientiâ” would excite no astonishment.


INTRODUCTION.

Although this work was published anonymously, there never was any question as to who was its author. It was always known to be the production of Provost Hely Hutchinson, and its first appearance was greeted with two different sorts of reception. It was burned by the Common Hangman so effectually, that Mr. Flood said he would give a thousand pounds for a copy and that the libraries of all the three branches of the legislature could not produce a copy[108]—and at the same time it “earned Mr. Hely Hutchinson’s pardon from Irish patriotism for his subserviency to the Court and Lord Townshend.”[109] The book was the outcome of the stubborn inability of English rulers to interpret the face of this country; and the first sketch of the publication was the papers which the author contributed to Lord Lieutenant Buckinghamshire in 1779 as to the cause of the existing ruin here and as to its cure. The purport of the Letters was to exhibit, calmly and seriously, and as by a friend to both countries, the grievous oppressions which the greedy spirit of English trade inflicted on the commerce, industries, and manufactures of Ireland during the century and a quarter that extended from the Restoration of Charles II. to the rise of Grattan. The author draws all his statements from the Statute Books and Commons Journals of both kingdoms, while he does not fail to support his own conclusions and comments by State Papers and Statistical Returns that possess an authority equal to that of the Statutes. He lays the whole length and breadth of the position steadily and searchingly before the Viceroy’s eyes. He shows him that the then state of Ireland teemed with every circumstance of national poverty, while the country itself abounded in the conditions of national prosperity. Of productiveness there was no lack; but land produce was greatly reduced in value; wool had fallen one half, wheat one third, black cattle in the same proportion, and hides in a much greater. There were no buyers, tenants were not to be found, landlords lost one fourth of their rents, merchants could do no business, and within two years over twenty thousand manufacturers in this city were disemployed, beggared, and supported by alms. All this was after a period of fourscore years of profound internal peace—and the question was, what was the cause of it?