The Great Chamberlain occurs again on fo. 97b, where we read:
'In alia Adington Albric[us] Camerar[ius], ii. hid. de feodo Regis.'
[10] If, as probable, the son of the Domesday Baron.
[11] Chronicon Petroburgense, pp. 168-9.
[12] Holy Trinity Priory, York, p. 35.
[13] Since this was written I have come across a curious confirmation of the hypothesis advanced. In the Lindsey Survey (Ed. Greenstreet), an entry on fo. 20, in the original ran: 'Comes Odo [tenet] in Aldobi', above which a later hand has interlined, 'De feodo Comitis Albemerle'. It is curious that in the same survey another later interlineation—'Comes Lincoln'—was, though distinguished by Hearne, incorporated with the text by Mr Waters (see p. [151]).
[14] Eudo was identified with Colchester.
[15] Giving a total of 2⅝, instead of 2½—a trivial discrepancy.
[16] It is singular that in Sussex the 'Cloninctune' of Domesday is, conversely, an error for 'Doninctune'. The source of the error in both cases must have been the likeness of 'cl' to 'd' in the original returns, on which these names cannot have begun with a capital letter.
[17] Rot. Pip., 31 Hen. I.