[105] N.C., v. 378.
[106] Gneist, C.H., i. 129, 156.
[107] Freeman, N.C., v. 372, 371.
[108] Stubbs, C.H., i. 261.
[109] Mr Hall informs me that is the name of the official referred to.
[110] 'Prout rumor ex rotulis ad me devenit.'
[112] 'Et nota quod quandocumque assidentur scutagia, licet eodem anno solvantur, annotantur tamen in annali anni sequentis' (Red Book, ed. Hall, p. 8).
[113] It is just possible that the source of his error is to be found in a solitary entry on the roll of 1163: 'Advocatus de Betuna reddit compotum de vi. li. xiii. s. iiii. d. de auxilio exercitus de Tolusa' (p. 9)—which refers to the levy of 1161.
[114] 'Temporibus enim regis Henrici primi ... nec inspexi vel audivi fuisse scutagia assisa' (p. 5).