[105] N.C., v. 378.

[106] Gneist, C.H., i. 129, 156.

[107] Freeman, N.C., v. 372, 371.

[108] Stubbs, C.H., i. 261.

[109] Mr Hall informs me that is the name of the official referred to.

[110] 'Prout rumor ex rotulis ad me devenit.'

[111] See p. [221] infra.

[112] 'Et nota quod quandocumque assidentur scutagia, licet eodem anno solvantur, annotantur tamen in annali anni sequentis' (Red Book, ed. Hall, p. 8).

[113] It is just possible that the source of his error is to be found in a solitary entry on the roll of 1163: 'Advocatus de Betuna reddit compotum de vi. li. xiii. s. iiii. d. de auxilio exercitus de Tolusa' (p. 9)—which refers to the levy of 1161.

[114] 'Temporibus enim regis Henrici primi ... nec inspexi vel audivi fuisse scutagia assisa' (p. 5).