[11] The MS. reads, 'thus micel is gewered ... viiii. and xx. hida and i. hida and viiii. and fifti hida inland'. The text is clearly corrupt.
[12] There is no entry for 'waste' in this hundred, so that possibly the words 'xv. hida westa' are omitted.
[13] There are clearly some words omitted here in the Peterborough transcript. We must read: 'and thereof is "gewered" [? 26 hide and] five and twenty hides inland'.
[14] Monasticon, vi. 1090.
[15] Infra, p. 175.
[16] Infra, p. 173.
[17] See my paper on 'The great carucage of 1198' (English Historical Review, iii, 501 et seq.).
[18] 'Et ego ipse custodio forestagium Regis de feodo meo; et debeo ire cum corpore Regis in servitio suo paratus equis et armis, cornu meo in collo meo pendente.'—Lib. Rub., i, 333.
[19] Domesday Studies, pp. 117-9.