[215] As is not unfrequently the case in similar narratives, this charter is wrongly introduced; for it clearly cannot be so early as 1137. It was edited by me in ‘Ancient Charters’ (p. 48) from Ancient Deeds, A. 6683, and assigned to 1143–1148, as being obviously subsequent to the fall of the earl of Essex.
[216] See ‘Geoffrey de Mandeville,’ pp. 222–4.
[217] Trans: ‘Englistcuit’ (the ‘t’ and ‘u’ being obvious misreadings). The text is, it will be seen, corrupt.
[218] Trans: ‘Crichcote.’
[219] Report ut supra, p. 66 b; ‘Geoffrey de Mandeville,’ pp. 435–6.
[220] Report ut supra, pp. 61 b, 67 b; cf. ‘Domesday of St. Paul’s,’ p. 124.
[221] London and Middlesex Archæological Transactions, vol. v., pp. 477–493. These documents are the same as those entered in the Priory’s cartulary.
[222] Ibid. p. 480; cf. pp. 490, 491.
[223] London, p. 30.
[224] “Seven or eight” on p. 30.