[235] Strype, Cran. p. 17.
[236] See Burnet, Hist. of Ref. vol. i. p. 123. fol. where the oaths are given at full.
[237] Cranmer, when examined before the commissioners at Oxford, touching the supremacy, urges with great force this same argument against the Queen herself, whose oaths to the state and to the pope being so repugnant.—“She must needs be forsworn to the one.”—Fox, vol. iii. p. 660.
[238] See Jewel’s Defence of the Apology, p. 634, fol.
[239] 2 Cor. xi. 5.
[240] xlix. 23.
[241] 2 Kings, xxii.
[242] See Jewel’s Defence of the Apology, p. 571.
[243] See The Icon Basilike, chap. xvii., quoted by Warburton in his “Alliance between Church and State.”
[244] See Sozomen, Hist. Eccles. lib. i. c. xvii. Euseb. de Vit. Constantin. iii. c. vii. Theodoret, Hist. Eccles. i. c. vii.