Mon.
Day,
and
Year.
Variation.DifferenceRemarks, &c. &c.
1814
May
1124° 49´ WVery good sights.
1226 18— —
1621 35 }5° 25— —
1627 0 }— —
1727 40— —
2424 49— —
2524 4— —
2620 14— —
Jun
211 35Very good. Sounded 100 fathoms, fine mud.
414 28Not very good.
8 4 55 } 6 25Very good.} Both sights were equally good. The ship was immediately put on the other tack.
811 20 }Very good.}
1313 10Very good. North Cape N.W.bW.½W. 5 leagues.
1816 12Very good.
2619 6Very good. Ship surrounded with ice.
Jul.
3 9 22Very good.
2216 6Very good.
Aug.
126 42Very good. Ship some motion.
225 14Very good.
222 4 } 7 37All these sights were equally good. The evening was remarkablyfine, with a light air from the S.E. The first set was taken with the ship’s head S.S.W.; 2d set at West; and 3d set atN.E.bN. The ship was put round in this manner for the purpose.
225 11 }
217 34 }
826 43The mean of six sets all good. The weather calm and fine.
1131 15The mean of two sets ship steady. Longitude obtained by ☉, ☽, and chronometer.
1430 36 } 5 8Very good.
1425 28 }Very good. North end of Shetland, S. 11° E. 5 or 6 leagues.
1430 40 }10 25Very good. North end of Shetland, S. 48° W. 4 or 5 leagues.
1520 15 }Very good. Outer Skerry, Shetland, S.S.W. 2 miles.
1730 32Very good. Lamb Head, Orkneys, W.½S. 4 or 5 miles.
Sept.
233 1 } 3 30Both these sights were good, and the ship was put on the courses,as given purposely. St. Kilda Island S. 9° W. 8 or 9 leagues. No soundings at 180 fathoms.
229 31 }
1322 30At anchor in St. Mary’s. St. Agnes’s Light-House W. 54° S. Castle E. 51° S.
1427 16This azimuth was taken on shore at St. Agnes’s Light-House, with false horizon.
1427 31This amplitude was taken on shore at St. Mary’s flag-staff.—Most excellent.

[Transcriber's Note: The table was laid out in the original with the data on one page and the Remarks on the next, this table has been divided to fit the page constraints. The date column has been duplicated and for ease of cross referencing.]

No. IV.

In the Appendix to the second volume of Flinders’ Voyage, which has lately been published, there is an article of considerable length and ability, on the Variation of the Compass. In that article, the observations made by that excellent sailor, corroborate, in a remarkable degree, and accord with those made in the Sybyll. I have selected a few of the most decisive instances.

1802.Lat.Long.Course.Var.Diff.
April
22. A.M.39° 38´S.141° 40´E. az.W.S.W.11° 52´E.}3° 53´
24.39 38144 1. 7 59 }
July
15. P.M.34 5135 9S.E.bE. 1 33 W.}5 39
34 6135 9 ampl.S.W.bW. 3 56 E.}
28.25 0153 23N.W.bN. 9 39 }3 6
29.24 43153 27S.E.½S. 6 33 }

After such a coincidence, the fact of the variations depending greatly on the ship’s course cannot possibly be called in question; though it is certainly surprising that it has not been sooner attended to in the way that it deserves, by other navigators; for it did not altogether escape their observations. Mr. Wales, astronomer to Captain Cook’s ship, the Resolution, had made the same observations in a pretty accurate manner; and M. Entrecasteaux, though without assigning any cause, says, that the “Compass showed differences of several degrees in variation at sea, though observed with the greatest care, and within the space of a few minutes.”

After a more enlarged series of observations shall have been taken, and after the attention of astronomers is directed to this fact, we may confidently expect a most important improvement in the science of navigation.

No. V.